Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

R1 0528 vs GPT Audio Mini

R1 0528 and GPT Audio Mini cost about the same per output token ($2.18 vs $2.40 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

R1 0528DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
46.8
Output $/M
$2.18
GPT Audio MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.40
vs $2.18 vs $2.40 per 1M output tokens. R1 0528 is 1.1x cheaper.

R1 0528 or GPT Audio Mini: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick R1 0528 for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($2.18 vs $2.40 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 128K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. R1 0528 has results on Aider polyglot, LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run); GPT Audio Mini has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
R1 0528 not benchmarked, GPT Audio Mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
R1 0528 $2.18 against GPT Audio Mini $2.40 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
R1 0528 takes 164K tokens, GPT Audio Mini 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index7 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for R1 0528 and GPT Audio Mini
BenchmarkR1 0528GPT Audio MiniLeader
Aider polyglot71.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
WeirdML41.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ALE-Bench804.1Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: coding1427Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1435Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for R1 0528 and GPT Audio Mini
BenchmarkR1 0528GPT Audio MiniLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.1Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for R1 0528 and GPT Audio Mini
BenchmarkR1 0528GPT Audio MiniLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom36.5%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
METR time horizons53.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
BrowseComp-Plus16.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for R1 0528 and GPT Audio Mini
BenchmarkR1 0528GPT Audio MiniLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.3%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)76.3%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI21.2%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI-21.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SimpleBench40.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1415Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: expert1394Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1422Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for R1 0528 and GPT Audio Mini
BenchmarkR1 0528GPT Audio MiniLeader
AA Math Index76.0Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)76.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
MATH level 596.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: math1400Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1415Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for R1 0528 and GPT Audio Mini
BenchmarkR1 0528GPT Audio MiniLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: science1430Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1445Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1419Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1402Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for R1 0528 and GPT Audio Mini
BenchmarkR1 0528GPT Audio MiniLeader
Design Arena: websites1149Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: UI components1103Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: game dev1097Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: data viz1182Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: 3D1111Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1139Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Design Arena: SVG1039Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards measured
General benchmarks for R1 0528 and GPT Audio Mini
BenchmarkR1 0528GPT Audio MiniLeader
IFBench39.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Fiction.LiveBench75.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text1428Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1382Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1405Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: English1437Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1412Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1442Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: German1404Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1391Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1360Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: French1417Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1411Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1423Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1428Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1405Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1391Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1402Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1400Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

R1 0528$0.0016Fits in one request
GPT Audio Mini$0.0018Fits in one request

R1 0528 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

R1 0528$0.032Fits in one request
GPT Audio Mini$0.037Fits in one request

R1 0528 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

R1 0528$0.122Exceeds the context window
GPT Audio Mini$0.144Exceeds the context window

R1 0528 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of R1 0528 and GPT Audio Mini
SpecificationDeepSeek R1 0528OpenAI GPT Audio Mini
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 28, 2025January 19, 2026
Context window164K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.60
Output $/Mtok$2.18$2.40
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is R1 0528 better than GPT Audio Mini for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick R1 0528 for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($2.18 vs $2.40 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or GPT Audio Mini?

R1 0528 costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.18 per million output tokens; GPT Audio Mini costs $0.60 and $2.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, R1 0528 or GPT Audio Mini?

R1 0528, with 164K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both R1 0528 and GPT Audio Mini?

No benchmark has tested both yet. R1 0528 has results on Aider polyglot, LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run); GPT Audio Mini has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next