Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

R1 0528 vs GLM 5V Turbo

GLM 5V Turbo leads R1 0528 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 13.1, and R1 0528 costs 1.8x less per output token ($2.18 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 41 benchmarks have a result for both.

R1 0528DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
46.8
Output $/M
$2.18
2
GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
39
vs boards won of 41 shared

R1 0528 or GLM 5V Turbo: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick R1 0528 for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($2.18 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
41
R1 0528 only
19
GLM 5V Turbo only
24
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
R1 0528 not benchmarked, GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 62.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: R1 0528 36.5% against GLM 5V Turbo 98.5%, 62.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
R1 0528 $2.18 against GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
R1 0528 takes 164K tokens, GLM 5V Turbo 203K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryR1 0528BarsGLM 5V TurboTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning14
Math02
Knowledge13
Web design07
General018
All shared boards239
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for R1 0528 and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkR1 0528GLM 5V TurboLeader
Aider polyglot71.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1402Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%32.6%GLM 5V Turbo
WeirdML41.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ALE-Bench804.1Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: coding14271466GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT14351460GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1386Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1425Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for R1 0528 and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkR1 0528GLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.123.5GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for R1 0528 and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkR1 0528GLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1124Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1149Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1134Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1267Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured957Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1102Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1070Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1127Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom36.5%98.5%GLM 5V Turbo
METR time horizons53.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
BrowseComp-Plus16.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Reasoning benchmarks for R1 0528 and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkR1 0528GLM 5V TurboLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.3%80.9%R1 0528
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%17.1%GLM 5V Turbo
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)76.3%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI21.2%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI-21.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SimpleBench40.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14151443GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert13941453GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14221456GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1286Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1273Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for R1 0528 and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkR1 0528GLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Math Index76.0Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)76.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
MATH level 596.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: math14001442GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work14151447GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Knowledge benchmarks for R1 0528 and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkR1 0528GLM 5V TurboLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: science14301448GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14451433R1 0528
LMArena Text: legal and government14191436GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance14021435GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for R1 0528 and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkR1 0528GLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: websites11491230GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: UI components11001210GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: game dev10971218GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: data viz11821202GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: 3D11101208GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories11381228GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: SVG10381151GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1117Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for R1 0528 and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkR1 0528GLM 5V TurboLeader
IFBench39.6%61.1%GLM 5V Turbo
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%70.3%GLM 5V Turbo
Fiction.LiveBench75.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text14281437GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following13821423GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing14051417GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena VisionNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English14371454GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English14121420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese14421491GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German14041422GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Japanese1391Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: Korean13601397GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: French14171443GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Spanish14111452GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Russian14231432GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Polish14281432GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: multi-turn14051431GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries13911438GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language14021420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14001407GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1274Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1329Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1268Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1241Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1252Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1416Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for R1 0528 and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkR1 0528GLM 5V TurboLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

R1 0528$0.0016Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request

R1 0528 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

R1 0528$0.032Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request

R1 0528 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

R1 0528$0.122Exceeds the context window
GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window

R1 0528 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of R1 0528 and GLM 5V Turbo
SpecificationDeepSeek R1 0528Z.ai GLM 5V Turbo
MakerDeepSeekZ.ai
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 28, 2025April 1, 2026
Context window164K203K
Input $/Mtok$0.50$1.20
Output $/Mtok$2.18$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is R1 0528 better than GLM 5V Turbo for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick R1 0528 for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($2.18 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or GLM 5V Turbo?

R1 0528 costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.18 per million output tokens; GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, R1 0528 or GLM 5V Turbo?

GLM 5V Turbo, with 203K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the R1 0528 vs GLM 5V Turbo comparison based on?

41 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. R1 0528's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GLM 5V Turbo's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next