Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3 vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime

DeepSeek V3 costs 12.5x less per output token than Qwen3.8 Max Prime ($0.9594 vs $12.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

DeepSeek V3DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.9594
Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$12.00
vs $0.9594 vs $12.00 per 1M output tokens. DeepSeek V3 is 12.5x cheaper.

DeepSeek V3 or Qwen3.8 Max Prime: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3 for output tokens 12.5x cheaper ($0.9594 vs $12.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V3 has results on Aider polyglot, SWE-bench Lite and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run); Qwen3.8 Max Prime has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3 not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 Max Prime not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
DeepSeek V3 $0.9594 against Qwen3.8 Max Prime $12.00 per million output tokens, 12.5x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3 takes 164K tokens, Qwen3.8 Max Prime 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.8 Max Prime
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLeader
Aider polyglot70.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
SWE-bench Lite30.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.8 Max Prime
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLeader
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)71.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.8 Max Prime
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLeader
OTIS Mock AIME48.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.8 Max Prime
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLeader
Design Arena: websites1120Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1093Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1053Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1089Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1087Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1108Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: SVG976Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.8 Max Prime
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLeader
DTBench62.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LMCA15.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.0008Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max Prime$0.010Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.017Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max Prime$0.236Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.067Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.8 Max Prime$0.920Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.8 Max Prime
SpecificationDeepSeek V3Qwen3.8 Max Prime
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 26, 2024September 23, 2026
Context window164K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.2887$4.00
Output $/Mtok$0.9594$12.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3 better than Qwen3.8 Max Prime for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3 for output tokens 12.5x cheaper ($0.9594 vs $12.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?

DeepSeek V3 costs $0.2887 per million input tokens and $0.9594 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max Prime costs $4.00 and $12.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3 or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?

Qwen3.8 Max Prime, with 1M tokens against 164K.

Has any benchmark tested both DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.8 Max Prime?

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V3 has results on Aider polyglot, SWE-bench Lite and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run); Qwen3.8 Max Prime has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next