Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V3DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.9594
Llama 3.2 3B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
5.7
Output $/M
$0.3325
vs $0.9594 vs $0.3325 per 1M output tokens. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is 2.9x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

DeepSeek V3 has the edge where the context window is larger, 164K against 131K tokens.

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V3 has results on Aider polyglot, SWE-bench Lite and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run); Llama 3.2 3B Instruct on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3 not benchmarked, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
DeepSeek V3 $0.9594 against Llama 3.2 3B Instruct $0.3325 per million output tokens, 2.9x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3 takes 164K tokens, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
Aider polyglot70.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
SWE-bench Lite30.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured8.3%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1098Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1103Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured5.7Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured21.1%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
BALROGNot measured10.1%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.5%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured5.3%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)71.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1095Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1090Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1141Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured3.3Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.3%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME48.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1126Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1128Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.7%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1106Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1104Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1115Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1074Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1120Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1093Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1053Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1089Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1087Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1108Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: SVG977Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards measured
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
IFBenchNot measured26.2%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured4.3%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
DTBench62.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LMCA15.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1110Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1089Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1094Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1180Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1019Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1017Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1056Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured949Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1105Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1100Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1096Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1083Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.0008Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.0002Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.017Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.0035Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.067Exceeds the context window
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.013Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
SpecificationDeepSeek V3Meta Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
MakerDeepSeekMeta Llama
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 26, 2024September 25, 2024
Context window164K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.2887$0.0505
Output $/Mtok$0.9594$0.3325
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3 better than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. DeepSeek V3 has the edge where the context window is larger, 164K against 131K tokens.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

DeepSeek V3 costs $0.2887 per million input tokens and $0.9594 per million output tokens; Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs $0.0505 and $0.3325. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3 or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

DeepSeek V3, with 164K tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both DeepSeek V3 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V3 has results on Aider polyglot, SWE-bench Lite and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run); Llama 3.2 3B Instruct on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next