Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3 vs GLM 4.5V

Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V3DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.9594
GLM 4.5VZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
7.6
Output $/M
$1.80
vs $0.9594 vs $1.80 per 1M output tokens. DeepSeek V3 is 1.9x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

DeepSeek V3 has the edge where output tokens cost 1.9x less, and where the context window is larger, 164K against 66K tokens.

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V3 has results on Aider polyglot, SWE-bench Lite and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run); GLM 4.5V on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3 not benchmarked, GLM 4.5V not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
DeepSeek V3 $0.9594 against GLM 4.5V $1.80 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3 takes 164K tokens, GLM 4.5V 66K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index6 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5V
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5VLeader
Aider polyglot70.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
SWE-bench Lite30.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured60.4%Only GLM 4.5V measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.8%Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1347Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1353Only GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5V
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5VLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured7.6Only GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5V
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5VLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured22.5%Only GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5V
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5VLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured68.4%Only GLM 4.5V measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.3%Only GLM 4.5V measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)71.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1335Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1353Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1357Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1151Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1163Only GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5V
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5VLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured73.0Only GLM 4.5V measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured73.0%Only GLM 4.5V measured
OTIS Mock AIME48.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1354Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1336Only GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5V
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5VLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.8%Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1330Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1349Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1338Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1309Only GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5V
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5VLeader
Design Arena: websites1120Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1093Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1053Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1089Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1087Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1108Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: SVG977Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards measured
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5V
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5VLeader
IFBenchNot measured34.2%Only GLM 4.5V measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured0.0%Only GLM 4.5V measured
DTBench62.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LMCA15.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1333Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1311Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1294Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1154Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1362Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1303Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1337Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1336Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1298Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1302Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1333Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1305Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1302Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1303Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1183Only GLM 4.5V measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1151Only GLM 4.5V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.0008Fits in one request
GLM 4.5V$0.0015Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.017Fits in one request
GLM 4.5V$0.035Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.067Exceeds the context window
GLM 4.5V$0.138Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5V
SpecificationDeepSeek V3Z.ai GLM 4.5V
MakerDeepSeekZ.ai
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 26, 2024August 11, 2025
Context window164K66K
Input $/Mtok$0.2887$0.60
Output $/Mtok$0.9594$1.80
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3 better than GLM 4.5V for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. DeepSeek V3 has the edge where output tokens cost 1.9x less, and where the context window is larger, 164K against 66K tokens.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 or GLM 4.5V?

DeepSeek V3 costs $0.2887 per million input tokens and $0.9594 per million output tokens; GLM 4.5V costs $0.60 and $1.80. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3 or GLM 4.5V?

DeepSeek V3, with 164K tokens against 66K.

Has any benchmark tested both DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5V?

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V3 has results on Aider polyglot, SWE-bench Lite and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run); GLM 4.5V on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next