Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3 vs GLM 4.5 Air

DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5 Air cost about the same per output token ($0.9594 vs $1.10 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.9594
1
GLM 4.5 AirZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
7
vs boards won of 8 shared

DeepSeek V3 or GLM 4.5 Air: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3 for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($0.9594 vs $1.10 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 131K tokens).

Shared results
8
DeepSeek V3 only
6
GLM 4.5 Air only
40
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3 not benchmarked, GLM 4.5 Air not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 9.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: data viz: DeepSeek V3 1089 against GLM 4.5 Air 1186, 12.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3 $0.9594 against GLM 4.5 Air $1.10 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3 takes 164K tokens, GLM 4.5 Air 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3BarsGLM 4.5 AirTies
Reasoning10
Web design07
All shared boards17
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index7 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5 AirLeader
Aider polyglot70.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
SWE-bench Lite30.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured68.4%Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured20.5%Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
GSO-BenchNot measured2.9%Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1397Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1401Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5 AirLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured11.1Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5 AirLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured46.5%Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5 AirLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured73.3%Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured7.0%Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)71.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1379Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1370Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1388Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%43.0%DeepSeek V3
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5 AirLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured80.7Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.7%Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
OTIS Mock AIME48.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1396Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1396Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5 AirLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured81.5%Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1407Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1402Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1382Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1371Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5 AirLeader
Design Arena: websites11201146GLM 4.5 Air
Design Arena: UI components10931123GLM 4.5 Air
Design Arena: game dev10531094GLM 4.5 Air
Design Arena: data viz10891186GLM 4.5 Air
Design Arena: 3D10871123GLM 4.5 Air
Design Arena: all code categories11081137GLM 4.5 Air
Design Arena: SVG9761071GLM 4.5 Air
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5 AirLeader
IFBenchNot measured37.6%Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured46.7%Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
DTBench62.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LMCA15.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1384Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1354Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1343Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1397Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1366Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1426Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1377Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1348Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1308Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1400Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1385Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1373Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1368Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1371Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1366Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1354Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1339Only GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5 Air
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GLM 4.5 AirLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.0008Fits in one request
GLM 4.5 Air$0.0008Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.017Fits in one request
GLM 4.5 Air$0.013Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.067Exceeds the context window
GLM 4.5 Air$0.051Exceeds the context window

GLM 4.5 Air costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3 and GLM 4.5 Air
SpecificationDeepSeek V3Z.ai GLM 4.5 Air
MakerDeepSeekZ.ai
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 26, 2024July 25, 2025
Context window164K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.2887$0.20
Output $/Mtok$0.9594$1.10
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3 better than GLM 4.5 Air for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3 for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($0.9594 vs $1.10 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 131K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 or GLM 4.5 Air?

DeepSeek V3 costs $0.2887 per million input tokens and $0.9594 per million output tokens; GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.20 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3 or GLM 4.5 Air?

DeepSeek V3, with 164K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3 vs GLM 4.5 Air comparison based on?

8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GLM 4.5 Air's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next