Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs 1.4x less per output token than DeepSeek V3.1 ($1.10 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
0
R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
2
vs boards won of 2 shared

DeepSeek V3.1 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.1 for work measured by Design Arena: websites or Design Arena: game dev, where it leads.

Shared results
2
DeepSeek V3.1 only
9
Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
26
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.1 not benchmarked, Beam 1.0 501B A23B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 16.8 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: DeepSeek V3.1 1084 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1224, 17.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.1 $1.50 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.10 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.1 takes 164K tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1BarsBeam 1.0 501B A23BTies
Web design02
All shared boards02
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1437Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1473Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1461Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1443Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1436Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Neither model has a result on 41 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1442Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1447Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1451Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1459Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1475Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1430Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1376Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1433Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1430Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Design Arena: websites11221250Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Design Arena: UI components1085Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: game dev10841224Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Design Arena: data viz1096Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: 3D1077Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1112Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: SVG967Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
DTBench82.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
LMCA24.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1425Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1430Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1390Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1436Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1413Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1424Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1461Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1412Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1414Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1429Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1400Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1399Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.0013Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0009Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.032Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.021Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.125Exceeds the context window
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.081Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.1Reflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B
MakerDeepSeekReflection
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 21, 2025October 16, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.55$0.35
Output $/Mtok$1.50$1.10
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.1 for work measured by Design Arena: websites or Design Arena: game dev, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.55 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.35 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.1 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next