Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

DeepSeek V3.1 leads Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 13.7 to 7.9, and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs 2.1x less per output token ($0.70 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
1
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.70
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

DeepSeek V3.1 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
1
DeepSeek V3.1 only
10
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct only
9
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.1 not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 5.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: DeepSeek V3.1 13.7 against Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct 7.9, 5.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.1 $1.50 against Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct $0.70 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.1 takes 164K tokens, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1BarsQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructTies
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured69.7%Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.1%Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.77.9DeepSeek V3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured19.9%Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured72.0%Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured8.9%Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured82.3Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.3%Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.7%Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1122Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: UI components1085Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: game dev1084Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: data viz1096Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: 3D1077Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1112Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: SVG967Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
IFBenchNot measured45.1%Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct measured
DTBench82.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
LMCA24.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.0013Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.032Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct$0.012Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.125Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct$0.047Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 21, 2025October 6, 2025
Context window164K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.55$0.20
Output $/Mtok$1.50$0.70
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 better than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.55 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.20 and $0.70. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next