Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

DeepSeek V3.1 leads Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 13.7 to 12.7, and DeepSeek V3.1 costs 2.3x less per output token ($1.50 vs $3.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 9 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
8
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
52.9
Output $/M
$3.50
1
vs boards won of 9 shared

DeepSeek V3.1 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.1 for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($1.50 vs $3.50 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 128K tokens).

Shared results
9
DeepSeek V3.1 only
2
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 only
37
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.1 not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 13.4 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: data viz: DeepSeek V3.1 1096 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 950, 18.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.1 $1.50 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.1 takes 164K tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1BarsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Ties
Intelligence10
Web design60
General11
All shared boards81
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Coding IndexNot measured22.1Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
WeirdMLNot measured41.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1424Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1431Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index13.712.7DeepSeek V3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.3Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured-$11Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured80.1%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured9.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1416Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1463Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1432Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1412Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1435Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured40.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1433Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1456Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1415Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1413Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites11221052DeepSeek V3.1
Design Arena: UI components1083942DeepSeek V3.1
Design Arena: game dev1084956DeepSeek V3.1
Design Arena: data viz1096950DeepSeek V3.1
Design Arena: 3D1077997DeepSeek V3.1
Design Arena: all code categories11121032DeepSeek V3.1
Design Arena: SVG967Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
DTBench82.7%80.3%DeepSeek V3.1
LMCA24.3%29.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured75.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured82.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1415Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1386Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1384Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1429Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1397Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1481Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1408Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1386Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1375Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1389Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1401Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1390Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1406Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1400Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1388Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1370Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.0013Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.0022Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.032Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.033Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.125Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.125Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 21, 2025July 25, 2025
Context window164K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.55$0.45
Output $/Mtok$1.50$3.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 better than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.1 for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($1.50 vs $3.50 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.55 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 and $3.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

DeepSeek V3.1, with 164K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next