Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command R7B (12-2024) vs GLM 5V Turbo

Command R7B (12-2024) costs 26.7x less per output token than GLM 5V Turbo ($0.15 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Command R7B (12-2024)Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.15
GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
vs $0.15 vs $4.00 per 1M output tokens. Command R7B (12-2024) is 26.7x cheaper.

Command R7B (12-2024) or GLM 5V Turbo: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Command R7B (12-2024) for output tokens 26.7x cheaper ($0.15 vs $4.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command R7B (12-2024) has results on Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL); GLM 5V Turbo on LMArena WebDev, Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command R7B (12-2024) not benchmarked, GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Command R7B (12-2024) $0.15 against GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 per million output tokens, 26.7x apart.
Context window
Command R7B (12-2024) takes 128K tokens, GLM 5V Turbo 203K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index7 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Command R7B (12-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R7B (12-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1402Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured32.6%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1466Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1460Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1386Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1425Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Command R7B (12-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R7B (12-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured23.5Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Command R7B (12-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R7B (12-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1124Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1149Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1134Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1267Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured957Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1102Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1070Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1127Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured98.5%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)32.1%Not measuredOnly Command R7B (12-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Command R7B (12-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R7B (12-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.9%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured17.1%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1443Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1453Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1456Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1286Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1273Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Command R7B (12-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R7B (12-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1442Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1447Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Command R7B (12-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R7B (12-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1448Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1433Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1436Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1435Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Command R7B (12-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R7B (12-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1230Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1210Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1218Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1202Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1208Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1228Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1151Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1117Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index27 boards measured
General benchmarks for Command R7B (12-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R7B (12-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
IFBenchNot measured61.1%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured70.3%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena TextNot measured1437Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1423Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1417Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1454Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1420Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1491Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1422Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1397Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1443Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1452Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1432Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1432Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1431Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1438Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1420Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1407Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1274Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1329Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1268Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1241Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1252Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1416Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command R7B (12-2024)$0.0001Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request

Command R7B (12-2024) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command R7B (12-2024)$0.0023Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request

Command R7B (12-2024) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command R7B (12-2024)$0.0090Exceeds the context window
GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window

Command R7B (12-2024) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command R7B (12-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
SpecificationCohere Command R7B (12-2024)Z.ai GLM 5V Turbo
MakerCohereZ.ai
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 14, 2024April 1, 2026
Context window128K203K
Input $/Mtok$0.0375$1.20
Output $/Mtok$0.15$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command R7B (12-2024) better than GLM 5V Turbo for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Command R7B (12-2024) for output tokens 26.7x cheaper ($0.15 vs $4.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Command R7B (12-2024) or GLM 5V Turbo?

Command R7B (12-2024) costs $0.0375 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command R7B (12-2024) or GLM 5V Turbo?

GLM 5V Turbo, with 203K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Command R7B (12-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command R7B (12-2024) has results on Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL); GLM 5V Turbo on LMArena WebDev, Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next