Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command R+ (08-2024) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs 20.0x less per output token than Command R+ (08-2024) ($0.50 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Command R+ (08-2024)Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
vs $10.00 vs $0.50 per 1M output tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 20.0x cheaper.

Command R+ (08-2024) or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command R+ (08-2024) has none yet; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on LiveBench coding, SciCode and AA Intelligence Index. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command R+ (08-2024) not benchmarked, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Command R+ (08-2024) $10.00 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
Context window
Command R+ (08-2024) takes 128K tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Command R+ (08-2024) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkCommand R+ (08-2024)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Command R+ (08-2024) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkCommand R+ (08-2024)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured26.5Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Command R+ (08-2024) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkCommand R+ (08-2024)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured70.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browserNot measured4.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured15.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Command R+ (08-2024) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkCommand R+ (08-2024)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured78.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured30.7%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Command R+ (08-2024) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkCommand R+ (08-2024)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1172Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1153Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1110Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1127Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1155Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.7%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for Command R+ (08-2024) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkCommand R+ (08-2024)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured64.6%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured69.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command R+ (08-2024)$0.0075Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command R+ (08-2024)$0.155Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command R+ (08-2024)$0.600Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command R+ (08-2024) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SpecificationCohere Command R+ (08-2024)NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerCohereNVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 30, 2024October 15, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.15
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command R+ (08-2024) better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ (08-2024) or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Command R+ (08-2024) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command R+ (08-2024) or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Command R+ (08-2024) and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command R+ (08-2024) has none yet; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on LiveBench coding, SciCode and AA Intelligence Index. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next