Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command R (08-2024) vs Solar Mini 4

Solar Mini 4 costs 3.0x less per output token than Command R (08-2024) ($0.20 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Command R (08-2024)Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
Solar Mini 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
vs $0.60 vs $0.20 per 1M output tokens. Solar Mini 4 is 3.0x cheaper.

Command R (08-2024) or Solar Mini 4: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command R (08-2024) has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts; Solar Mini 4 on SciCode, AA Intelligence Index and Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command R (08-2024) not benchmarked, Solar Mini 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Command R (08-2024) $0.60 against Solar Mini 4 $0.20 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
Context window
Command R (08-2024) takes 128K tokens, Solar Mini 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Solar Mini 4Leader
SciCodeNot measured47.6%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
LMArena Text: coding1187Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1197Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Solar Mini 4Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured24.1Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Solar Mini 4Leader
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.8%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1186Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: expert1173Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1194Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Solar Mini 4Leader
LMArena Text: math1188Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1198Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Solar Mini 4Leader
LMArena Text: science1252Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1238Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1268Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1215Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Solar Mini 4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1159Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1109Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1150Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards measured
General benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Solar Mini 4Leader
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured83.3%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
LMArena Text1229Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1197Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1234Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: English1238Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1216Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1227Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: German1216Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1166Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1162Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1227Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1213Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1230Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1241Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1223Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0004Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0093Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0031Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.036Exceeds the context window
Solar Mini 4$0.012Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command R (08-2024) and Solar Mini 4
SpecificationCohere Command R (08-2024)Upstage Solar Mini 4
MakerCohereUpstage
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 30, 2024September 23, 2026
Context window128K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.05
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command R (08-2024) better than Solar Mini 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Command R (08-2024) or Solar Mini 4?

Command R (08-2024) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command R (08-2024) or Solar Mini 4?

Solar Mini 4, with 524K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Command R (08-2024) and Solar Mini 4?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command R (08-2024) has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts; Solar Mini 4 on SciCode, AA Intelligence Index and Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next