Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command R (08-2024) vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Updated October 21, 2026. 25 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Command R (08-2024)Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
11.9
Output $/M
$1.50
25
vs boards won of 25 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Command R (08-2024) has the edge where output tokens cost 2.5x less, and where what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
25
Command R (08-2024) only
0
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B only
27
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command R (08-2024) not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 35.1 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: coding: Command R (08-2024) 1187 against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 1412, 37.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command R (08-2024) $0.60 against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B $1.50 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
Command R (08-2024) takes 128K tokens, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand R (08-2024)BarsQwen3 Coder 480B A35BTies
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General014
All shared boards025
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured69.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1275Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured58.5%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured18.9%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured27.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
GSO-BenchNot measured4.9%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
WeirdMLNot measured41.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
ALE-BenchNot measured461.4Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: coding11871412Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: software and IT11971393Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1257Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1287Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured11.9Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured43.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured61.8%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.5%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11861372Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: expert11731338Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English11941380Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured39.3Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.3%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: math11881365Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: mathematical work11981367Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.8%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: science12521347Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12381347Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: legal and government12681358Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: business and finance12151343Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1159Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1113Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1099Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1084Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1143Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index014
General benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
IFBenchNot measured40.5%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured45.7%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text12291357Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: instruction following11971355Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: creative writing12341333Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: English12381359Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: non-English12161346Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Chinese12271357Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: German12161325Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Japanese11661311Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Korean11621305Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1398Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1360Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: Russian12271366Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1344Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12131366Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: longer queries12301378Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: writing and language12411340Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12231317Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.0010Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0093Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.019Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.036Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.075Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
SpecificationCohere Command R (08-2024)Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
MakerCohereQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 30, 2024July 23, 2025
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.60$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command R (08-2024) better than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command R (08-2024) has the edge where output tokens cost 2.5x less, and where what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Command R (08-2024) or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Command R (08-2024) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs $0.30 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command R (08-2024) or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Command R (08-2024) vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command R (08-2024)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next