Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command R (08-2024) vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Qwen3.8 Flash costs 1.3x less per output token than Command R (08-2024) ($0.47 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Command R (08-2024)Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
Qwen3.8 FlashQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.47
vs $0.60 vs $0.47 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash is 1.3x cheaper.

Command R (08-2024) or Qwen3.8 Flash: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command R (08-2024) has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts; Qwen3.8 Flash on LiveBench coding, LiveBench research and LiveBench browser. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command R (08-2024) not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Command R (08-2024) $0.60 against Qwen3.8 Flash $0.47 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Command R (08-2024) takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.8 Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3.8 FlashLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding1187Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1197Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3.8 FlashLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured74.6%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench browserNot measured48.0%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured37.1%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3.8 FlashLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1186Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: expert1173Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1194Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3.8 FlashLeader
LMArena Text: math1188Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1198Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3.8 FlashLeader
LMArena Text: science1252Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1238Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1268Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1215Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Web design benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3.8 FlashLeader
LiveBench designNot measured72.8%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards measured
General benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3.8 FlashLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured74.2%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text1229Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1197Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1234Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: English1238Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1216Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1227Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: German1216Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1166Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1162Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1227Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1213Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1230Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1241Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1223Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Flash$0.0004Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0093Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Flash$0.0089Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.036Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.8 Flash$0.035Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3.8 Flash
SpecificationCohere Command R (08-2024)Qwen3.8 Flash
MakerCohereQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 30, 2024August 26, 2026
Context window128K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.47
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command R (08-2024) better than Qwen3.8 Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Command R (08-2024) or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Command R (08-2024) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.15 and $0.47. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command R (08-2024) or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash, with 1M tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3.8 Flash?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command R (08-2024) has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts; Qwen3.8 Flash on LiveBench coding, LiveBench research and LiveBench browser. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next