Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command R (08-2024) vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Command R (08-2024) costs 5.8x less per output token than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ($0.60 vs $3.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 25 benchmarks have a result for both.

Command R (08-2024)Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
52.9
Output $/M
$3.50
25
vs boards won of 25 shared

Command R (08-2024) or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Command R (08-2024) for output tokens 5.8x cheaper ($0.60 vs $3.50 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
25
Command R (08-2024) only
0
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 only
21
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command R (08-2024) not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 42.1 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: expert: Command R (08-2024) 1173 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 1463, 48.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command R (08-2024) $0.60 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 per million output tokens, 5.8x apart.
Context window
Both take 128K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand R (08-2024)BarsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Ties
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General014
All shared boards025
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Coding IndexNot measured22.1Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
WeirdMLNot measured41.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: coding11871424Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: software and IT11971431Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured12.7Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.3Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured-$11Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured80.1%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured9.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11861416Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: expert11731463Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English11941432Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: math11881412Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: mathematical work11981435Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured40.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: science12521433Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12381456Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: legal and government12681415Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: business and finance12151413Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1052Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured942Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured956Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured950Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured997Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1032Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index014
General benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
DTBenchNot measured80.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMCANot measured29.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured75.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured82.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text12291415Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: instruction following11971386Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: creative writing12341384Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: English12381429Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: non-English12161397Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Chinese12271481Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: German12161408Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Japanese11661386Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Korean11621375Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1389Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: Russian12271401Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1390Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12131406Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: longer queries12301400Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: writing and language12411388Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12231370Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.0022Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0093Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.033Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.036Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.125Exceeds the context window

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
SpecificationCohere Command R (08-2024)Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
MakerCohereQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 30, 2024July 25, 2025
Context window128K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.45
Output $/Mtok$0.60$3.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command R (08-2024) better than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Command R (08-2024) for output tokens 5.8x cheaper ($0.60 vs $3.50 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Command R (08-2024) or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Command R (08-2024) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 and $3.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command R (08-2024) or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Neither: both take 128K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Command R (08-2024) vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Command R (08-2024)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next