Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command R (08-2024) vs Mistral Large 2407

Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Command R (08-2024)Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
Mistral Large 2407Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
7.6
Output $/M
$6.00
vs $0.60 vs $6.00 per 1M output tokens. Command R (08-2024) is 10.0x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Command R (08-2024) has the edge where output tokens cost 10.0x less.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command R (08-2024) has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts; Mistral Large 2407 on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), AA Intelligence Index and τ²-Bench Telecom. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command R (08-2024) not benchmarked, Mistral Large 2407 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Command R (08-2024) $0.60 against Mistral Large 2407 $6.00 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
Context window
Command R (08-2024) takes 128K tokens, Mistral Large 2407 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Mistral Large 2407Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured26.7%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: coding1187Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1197Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Mistral Large 2407Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured7.6Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Mistral Large 2407Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured33.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Mistral Large 2407Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured47.2%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured2.9%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured49.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured22.5%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1186Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: expert1173Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1194Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Mistral Large 2407Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured0.0Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured0.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured8.5%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
MATH level 5Not measured44.8%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: math1188Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1198Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Mistral Large 2407Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured68.3%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
MMLUNot measured80.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: science1252Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1238Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1268Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1215Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards measured
General benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Mistral Large 2407Leader
IFBenchNot measured31.6%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured2.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
DTBenchNot measured61.2%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured69.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text1229Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1197Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1234Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: English1238Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1216Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1227Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: German1216Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1166Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1162Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1227Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1213Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1230Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1241Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1223Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0004Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.0050Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0093Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.118Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.036Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large 2407$0.460Exceeds the context window

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command R (08-2024) and Mistral Large 2407
SpecificationCohere Command R (08-2024)Mistral Large 2407
MakerCohereMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 30, 2024November 19, 2024
Context window128K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.60$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command R (08-2024) better than Mistral Large 2407 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command R (08-2024) has the edge where output tokens cost 10.0x less.

Which is cheaper, Command R (08-2024) or Mistral Large 2407?

Command R (08-2024) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 2407 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command R (08-2024) or Mistral Large 2407?

Mistral Large 2407, with 131K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Command R (08-2024) and Mistral Large 2407?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command R (08-2024) has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts; Mistral Large 2407 on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), AA Intelligence Index and τ²-Bench Telecom. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next