Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command R (08-2024) vs MiniMax M2

Command R (08-2024) costs 1.7x less per output token than MiniMax M2 ($0.60 vs $1.02 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 23 benchmarks have a result for both.

Command R (08-2024)Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
MiniMax M2MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.02
23
vs boards won of 23 shared

Command R (08-2024) or MiniMax M2: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Command R (08-2024) for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($0.60 vs $1.02 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
23
Command R (08-2024) only
2
MiniMax M2 only
27
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command R (08-2024) not benchmarked, MiniMax M2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 29.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: coding: Command R (08-2024) 1187 against MiniMax M2 1371, 30.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command R (08-2024) $0.60 against MiniMax M2 $1.02 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
Command R (08-2024) takes 128K tokens, MiniMax M2 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand R (08-2024)BarsMiniMax M2Ties
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General012
All shared boards023
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)MiniMax M2Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured61.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1297Only MiniMax M2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.6%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.8%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured30.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: coding11871371MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: software and IT11971373MiniMax M2
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1306Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)MiniMax M2Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured18.6Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)MiniMax M2Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured86.8%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$161Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)MiniMax M2Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured77.7%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured13.7%Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11861357MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: expert11731338MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English11941376MiniMax M2
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured57.8%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)MiniMax M2Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured78.3Only MiniMax M2 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.3%Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: math11881351MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: mathematical work11981368MiniMax M2
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)MiniMax M2Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: science12521348MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12381367MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: legal and government12681349MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: business and finance12151336MiniMax M2
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)MiniMax M2Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1143Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1137Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1118Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1140Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1098Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1135Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1100Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index012
General benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)MiniMax M2Leader
IFBenchNot measured72.3%Only MiniMax M2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured64.3%Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text12291340MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: instruction following11971329MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: creative writing12341286MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: English12381364MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: non-English12161313MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: Chinese12271366MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: German12161357MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: Japanese1166Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1162Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1336Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1326Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: Russian12271330MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1312Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12131361MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: longer queries12301331MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: writing and language12411295MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12231298MiniMax M2
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)MiniMax M2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0004Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.0008Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0093Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.016Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.036Exceeds the context window
MiniMax M2$0.061Exceeds the context window

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command R (08-2024) and MiniMax M2
SpecificationCohere Command R (08-2024)MiniMax M2
MakerCohereMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 30, 2024October 23, 2025
Context window128K205K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.255
Output $/Mtok$0.60$1.02
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.702
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command R (08-2024) better than MiniMax M2 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Command R (08-2024) for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($0.60 vs $1.02 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Command R (08-2024) or MiniMax M2?

Command R (08-2024) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2 costs $0.255 and $1.02. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Command R (08-2024) or MiniMax M2?

MiniMax M2, with 205K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Command R (08-2024) vs MiniMax M2 comparison based on?

23 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Command R (08-2024)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next