Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command R (08-2024) vs GPT-5 Image Mini

Command R (08-2024) costs 3.3x less per output token than GPT-5 Image Mini ($0.60 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Command R (08-2024)Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
GPT-5 Image MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
vs $0.60 vs $2.00 per 1M output tokens. Command R (08-2024) is 3.3x cheaper.

Command R (08-2024) or GPT-5 Image Mini: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Command R (08-2024) for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $2.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command R (08-2024) has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts; GPT-5 Image Mini on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command R (08-2024) not benchmarked, GPT-5 Image Mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Command R (08-2024) $0.60 against GPT-5 Image Mini $2.00 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
Command R (08-2024) takes 128K tokens, GPT-5 Image Mini 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and GPT-5 Image Mini
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)GPT-5 Image MiniLeader
LMArena Text: coding1187Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1197Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and GPT-5 Image Mini
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)GPT-5 Image MiniLeader
LMArena Text: hard prompts1186Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: expert1173Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1194Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and GPT-5 Image Mini
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)GPT-5 Image MiniLeader
LMArena Text: math1188Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1198Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and GPT-5 Image Mini
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)GPT-5 Image MiniLeader
LMArena Text: science1252Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1238Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1268Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1215Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards measured
General benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and GPT-5 Image Mini
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)GPT-5 Image MiniLeader
LMArena Text1229Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1197Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1234Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: English1238Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1216Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1227Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: German1216Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1166Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1162Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1227Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1213Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1230Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1241Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1223Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Image generation benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and GPT-5 Image Mini
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)GPT-5 Image MiniLeader
Design Arena: imagesNot measured1184Only GPT-5 Image Mini measured
Design Arena: graphic designNot measured1165Only GPT-5 Image Mini measured
Design Arena: logosNot measured1209Only GPT-5 Image Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0004Fits in one request
GPT-5 Image Mini$0.0035Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0093Fits in one request
GPT-5 Image Mini$0.131Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.036Exceeds the context window
GPT-5 Image Mini$0.520Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command R (08-2024) and GPT-5 Image Mini
SpecificationCohere Command R (08-2024)OpenAI GPT-5 Image Mini
MakerCohereOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 30, 2024October 16, 2025
Context window128K400K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$2.50
Output $/Mtok$0.60$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command R (08-2024) better than GPT-5 Image Mini for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Command R (08-2024) for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $2.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Command R (08-2024) or GPT-5 Image Mini?

Command R (08-2024) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Image Mini costs $2.50 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command R (08-2024) or GPT-5 Image Mini?

GPT-5 Image Mini, with 400K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Command R (08-2024) and GPT-5 Image Mini?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command R (08-2024) has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts; GPT-5 Image Mini on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next