Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command R (08-2024) vs GLM 5V Turbo

Command R (08-2024) costs 6.7x less per output token than GLM 5V Turbo ($0.60 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 24 benchmarks have a result for both.

Command R (08-2024)Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
24
vs boards won of 24 shared

Command R (08-2024) or GLM 5V Turbo: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Command R (08-2024) for output tokens 6.7x cheaper ($0.60 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
24
Command R (08-2024) only
1
GLM 5V Turbo only
41
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command R (08-2024) not benchmarked, GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 45.1 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: expert: Command R (08-2024) 1173 against GLM 5V Turbo 1453, 46.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command R (08-2024) $0.60 against GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 per million output tokens, 6.7x apart.
Context window
Command R (08-2024) takes 128K tokens, GLM 5V Turbo 203K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand R (08-2024)BarsGLM 5V TurboTies
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General013
All shared boards024
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1402Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured32.6%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: coding11871466GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT11971460GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1386Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1425Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured23.5Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1124Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1149Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1134Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1267Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured957Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1102Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1120Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1152Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured98.5%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.9%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured17.1%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11861443GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert11731453GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English11941456GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1286Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1273Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
LMArena Text: math11881442GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work11981447GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
LMArena Text: science12521448GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12381433GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government12681436GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance12151435GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1230Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1213Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1219Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1202Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1209Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1228Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1151Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1117Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index013
General benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
IFBenchNot measured61.1%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured70.3%Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text12291437GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following11971423GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing12341417GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena VisionNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English12381454GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English12161420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese12271491GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German12161422GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Japanese1166Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Korean11621397GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1443Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1452Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Russian12271432GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1432Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12131431GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries12301438GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language12411420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12231407GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1274Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1329Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1268Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1241Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1252Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1416Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)GLM 5V TurboLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0004Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0093Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.036Exceeds the context window
GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command R (08-2024) and GLM 5V Turbo
SpecificationCohere Command R (08-2024)Z.ai GLM 5V Turbo
MakerCohereZ.ai
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 30, 2024April 1, 2026
Context window128K203K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.20
Output $/Mtok$0.60$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command R (08-2024) better than GLM 5V Turbo for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Command R (08-2024) for output tokens 6.7x cheaper ($0.60 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Command R (08-2024) or GLM 5V Turbo?

Command R (08-2024) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command R (08-2024) or GLM 5V Turbo?

GLM 5V Turbo, with 203K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Command R (08-2024) vs GLM 5V Turbo comparison based on?

24 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command R (08-2024)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GLM 5V Turbo's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next