Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A+ vs ReMM SLERP 13B

ReMM SLERP 13B costs 2.3x less per output token than Command A+ ($0.65 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Command A+Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
U ReMM SLERP 13BUndi95
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.65
vs $1.50 vs $0.65 per 1M output tokens. ReMM SLERP 13B is 2.3x cheaper.

Command A+ or ReMM SLERP 13B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Command A+ for a larger context window (192K against 6K tokens).

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A+ not benchmarked, ReMM SLERP 13B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Command A+ $1.50 against ReMM SLERP 13B $0.65 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
Command A+ takes 192K tokens, ReMM SLERP 13B 6K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A+$0.0010Fits in one request
ReMM SLERP 13B$0.0007Fits in one request

ReMM SLERP 13B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A+$0.019Fits in one request
ReMM SLERP 13B$0.019Exceeds the context window

ReMM SLERP 13B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A+$0.075Exceeds the context window
ReMM SLERP 13B$0.076Exceeds the context window

Command A+ costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A+ and ReMM SLERP 13B
SpecificationCohere Command A+ReMM SLERP 13B
MakerCohereUndi95
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2026July 22, 2023
Context window192K6K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.35
Output $/Mtok$1.50$0.65
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A+ better than ReMM SLERP 13B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Command A+ for a larger context window (192K against 6K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or ReMM SLERP 13B?

Command A+ costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; ReMM SLERP 13B costs $0.35 and $0.65. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A+ or ReMM SLERP 13B?

Command A+, with 192K tokens against 6K.

Has any benchmark tested both Command A+ and ReMM SLERP 13B?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next