Command A+ vs UnslopNemo 12B

UnslopNemo 12B costs 3.8x less per output token than Command A+ ($0.40 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Command A+ Replace UnslopNemo 12B

Command A+Cohere

Coding: No data
Overall: No data
Output $/M: $1.50

T UnslopNemo 12BTheDrummer

Coding: No data
Overall: No data
Output $/M: $0.40

vs $1.50 vs $0.40 per 1M output tokens. UnslopNemo 12B is 3.8x cheaper.

Command A+ or UnslopNemo 12B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Model ACommand A+CohereNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task Model BUnslopNemo 12BTheDrummerNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
UnslopNemo 12B
UnslopNemo 12B takes 1.02M tokens against 192K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
UnslopNemo 12B
Command A+ $0.0010, UnslopNemo 12B $0.0006 per turn.
List prices

At a glance

Coding index: Command A+ not benchmarked, UnslopNemo 12B not benchmarked.
Widest category: None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap: None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price: Command A+ $1.50 against UnslopNemo 12B $0.40 per million output tokens, 3.8x apart.
Context window: Command A+ takes 192K tokens, UnslopNemo 12B 1.02M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A+$0.0010Fits in one request

UnslopNemo 12B$0.0006Fits in one request

UnslopNemo 12B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A+$0.019Fits in one request

UnslopNemo 12B$0.021Fits in one request

Command A+ costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A+$0.075Exceeds the context window

UnslopNemo 12B$0.084Fits in one request

Command A+ costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A+ and UnslopNemo 12B
Specification	Cohere Command A+	TheDrummer UnslopNemo 12B
Maker	Cohere	TheDrummer
Weights	No public weights listed	Open weights
Released	September 22, 2026	November 8, 2024
Context window	192K	1.02M
Input $/Mtok	$0.30	$0.40
Output $/Mtok	$1.50	$0.40
Coding index	Not benchmarked	Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it	0	0
Cost per solved task	Not computable	Not computable
Source	OpenRouter listing	OpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A+ better than UnslopNemo 12B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or UnslopNemo 12B?

Command A+ costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; UnslopNemo 12B costs $0.40 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A+ or UnslopNemo 12B?

UnslopNemo 12B, with 1.02M tokens against 192K.

Has any benchmark tested both Command A+ and UnslopNemo 12B?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 22, 2026.