Command A+ vs Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $1.50
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.295
Decision reading
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Command A+ has the edge where the context window is larger, 192K against 8K tokens.
- Shared results
- 0
- Command A+ only
- 0
- Hy-MT2-30B-A3B only
- 0
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Command A+
Command A+ takes 192K tokens against 8K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
Command A+ $0.0010, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B $0.0002 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Command A+ not benchmarked, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- No category has a result for both models.
- Widest single gap
- No benchmark has a result for both models.
- Output price
- Command A+ $1.50 against Hy-MT2-30B-A3B $0.295 per million output tokens, 5.1x apart.
- Context window
- Command A+ takes 192K tokens, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B 8K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
CodingNot comparableSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | Hy-MT2-30B-A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 38 boards here | |||
IntelligenceNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | Hy-MT2-30B-A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 2 boards here | |||
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | Hy-MT2-30B-A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 39 boards here | |||
ReasoningNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | Hy-MT2-30B-A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 21 boards here | |||
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | Hy-MT2-30B-A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 13 boards here | |||
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | Hy-MT2-30B-A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 17 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | Hy-MT2-30B-A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | Hy-MT2-30B-A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 46 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | Hy-MT2-30B-A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Cohere Command A+ | Tencent Hy-MT2-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Cohere | Tencent |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | September 22, 2026 | August 20, 2026 |
| Context window | 192K | 8K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $0.074 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.50 | $0.295 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Command A+ better than Hy-MT2-30B-A3B for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command A+ has the edge where the context window is larger, 192K against 8K tokens.
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Hy-MT2-30B-A3B?
Command A+ costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs $0.074 and $0.295. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Command A+ or Hy-MT2-30B-A3B?
Command A+, with 192K tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks is the Command A+ vs Hy-MT2-30B-A3B comparison based on?
0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A+'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.