Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A+ vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Replace Command A+ Replace Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Command A+Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
Mistral Small 3.2 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
vs $1.50 vs $0.30 per 1M output tokens. Mistral Small 3.2 24B is 5.0x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Model ACommand A+CohereNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BMistral Small 3.2 24BMistral AINot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
0
Command A+ only
0
Mistral Small 3.2 24B only
5
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A+ not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3.2 24B not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
Command A+ $1.50 against Mistral Small 3.2 24B $0.30 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Command A+ takes 192K tokens, Mistral Small 3.2 24B 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingNot comparableSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index0 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkCommand A+Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 38 boards here
IntelligenceNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkCommand A+Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 2 boards here
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkCommand A+Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 39 boards here
ReasoningNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkCommand A+Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 21 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkCommand A+Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 13 boards here
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkCommand A+Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 17 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkCommand A+Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured896Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured907Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured888Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured929Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured907Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkCommand A+Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 46 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkCommand A+Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A+$0.0010Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.0003Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A+$0.019Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.0059Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A+$0.075Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.023Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
SpecificationCohere Command A+Mistral Small 3.2 24B
MakerCohereMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2026June 20, 2025
Context window192K256K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.10
Output $/Mtok$1.50$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A+ better than Mistral Small 3.2 24B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?

Command A+ costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs $0.10 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A+ or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B, with 256K tokens against 192K.

How many benchmarks is the Command A+ vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A+'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Small 3.2 24B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next