Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A+ vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs 2.7x less per output token than Command A+ ($0.555 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Command A+Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.555
vs $1.50 vs $0.555 per 1M output tokens. Mistral Small 3.1 24B is 2.7x cheaper.

Command A+ or Mistral Small 3.1 24B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Command A+ for a larger context window (192K against 128K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command A+ has none yet; Mistral Small 3.1 24B on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A+ not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3.1 24B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Command A+ $1.50 against Mistral Small 3.1 24B $0.555 per million output tokens, 2.7x apart.
Context window
Command A+ takes 192K tokens, Mistral Small 3.1 24B 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkCommand A+Mistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1309Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1301Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkCommand A+Mistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1278Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1257Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1290Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1119Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1158Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkCommand A+Mistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1261Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1271Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkCommand A+Mistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1265Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1267Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1271Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1257Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25 boards measured
General benchmarks for Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkCommand A+Mistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LMArena TextNot measured1277Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1263Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1252Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1136Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1295Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1255Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1253Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1266Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1208Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1207Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1273Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1284Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1263Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1242Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1270Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1299Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1268Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1250Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1157Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1155Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1132Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1142Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1153Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1155Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1123Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A+$0.0010Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.0006Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A+$0.019Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.019Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A+$0.075Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.076Exceeds the context window

Command A+ costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
SpecificationCohere Command A+Mistral Small 3.1 24B
MakerCohereMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2026March 17, 2025
Context window192K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.351
Output $/Mtok$1.50$0.555
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A+ better than Mistral Small 3.1 24B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Command A+ for a larger context window (192K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

Command A+ costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.351 and $0.555. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A+ or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

Command A+, with 192K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Command A+ and Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command A+ has none yet; Mistral Small 3.1 24B on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next