Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A+ vs MiniMax M1

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Command A+Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
MiniMax M1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
11.7
Output $/M
$2.20
vs $1.50 vs $2.20 per 1M output tokens. Command A+ is 1.5x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Command A+ has the edge where output tokens cost 1.5x less.

Shared results
0
Command A+ only
0
MiniMax M1 only
29
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A+ not benchmarked, MiniMax M1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
Command A+ $1.50 against MiniMax M1 $2.20 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
Command A+ takes 192K tokens, MiniMax M1 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Command A+ and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkCommand A+MiniMax M1Leader
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1359Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1359Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Command A+ and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkCommand A+MiniMax M1Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured11.7Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Command A+ and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkCommand A+MiniMax M1Leader
Neither model has a result on 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A+ and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkCommand A+MiniMax M1Leader
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1339Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1317Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1353Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Command A+ and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkCommand A+MiniMax M1Leader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1361Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1363Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A+ and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkCommand A+MiniMax M1Leader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1354Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1355Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1337Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1319Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command A+ and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkCommand A+MiniMax M1Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Command A+ and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkCommand A+MiniMax M1Leader
LMArena TextNot measured1343Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1312Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1297Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1363Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1319Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1360Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1350Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1217Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1266Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1370Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1353Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1329Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1329Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1335Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1326Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1311Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1303Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command A+ and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkCommand A+MiniMax M1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A+$0.0010Fits in one request
MiniMax M1$0.0015Fits in one request

Command A+ costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A+$0.019Fits in one request
MiniMax M1$0.027Fits in one request

Command A+ costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A+$0.075Exceeds the context window
MiniMax M1$0.102Fits in one request

Command A+ costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A+ and MiniMax M1
SpecificationCohere Command A+MiniMax M1
MakerCohereMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2026June 17, 2025
Context window192K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.40
Output $/Mtok$1.50$2.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A+ better than MiniMax M1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command A+ has the edge where output tokens cost 1.5x less.

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or MiniMax M1?

Command A+ costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 costs $0.40 and $2.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A+ or MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1, with 1M tokens against 192K.

How many benchmarks is the Command A+ vs MiniMax M1 comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A+'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M1's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next