Command A+ vs GPT-6 Astra Pro
Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $1.50
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $50.00
Decision reading
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Command A+ has the edge where output tokens cost 33.3x less.
- Shared results
- 0
- Command A+ only
- 0
- GPT-6 Astra Pro only
- 2
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-6 Astra Pro
GPT-6 Astra Pro takes 1.05M tokens against 192K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Command A+
Command A+ $0.0010, GPT-6 Astra Pro $0.035 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Command A+ not benchmarked, GPT-6 Astra Pro not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- No category has a result for both models.
- Widest single gap
- No benchmark has a result for both models.
- Output price
- Command A+ $1.50 against GPT-6 Astra Pro $50.00 per million output tokens, 33.3x apart.
- Context window
- Command A+ takes 192K tokens, GPT-6 Astra Pro 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | Not measured | 93.6% | Only GPT-6 Astra Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here | |||
IntelligenceNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 2 boards here | |||
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 39 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 76.0% | Only GPT-6 Astra Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 13 boards here | |||
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 17 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 46 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A+ | GPT-6 Astra Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Command A+ costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Command A+ costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Command A+ costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Cohere Command A+ | OpenAI GPT-6 Astra Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Cohere | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | September 22, 2026 | September 4, 2026 |
| Context window | 192K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $10.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.50 | $50.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Command A+ better than GPT-6 Astra Pro for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command A+ has the edge where output tokens cost 33.3x less.
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or GPT-6 Astra Pro?
Command A+ costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Astra Pro costs $10.00 and $50.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Command A+ or GPT-6 Astra Pro?
GPT-6 Astra Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 192K.
How many benchmarks is the Command A+ vs GPT-6 Astra Pro comparison based on?
0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A+'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-6 Astra Pro's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.