Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A+ vs GPT-5.1-Codex

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Command A+Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
GPT-5.1-CodexOpenAI
Coding
15.3
Overall
23.7
Output $/M
$10.00
vs $1.50 vs $10.00 per 1M output tokens. Command A+ is 6.7x cheaper.

Decision reading

Only GPT-5.1-Codex has a coding score, 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A+ has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Command A+ has the edge where output tokens cost 6.7x less.

Shared results
0
Command A+ only
0
GPT-5.1-Codex only
26
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A+ not benchmarked, GPT-5.1-Codex 15.3 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
Command A+ $1.50 against GPT-5.1-Codex $10.00 per million output tokens, 6.7x apart.
Context window
Command A+ takes 192K tokens, GPT-5.1-Codex 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-5.1-CodexLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured66.0%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1337Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.5%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured13.1%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.9%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.8%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured57.8%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1244.9Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1346Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-5.1-CodexLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured23.7Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-5.1-CodexLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1018Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1086Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1191Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured83.0%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-5.1-CodexLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured86.0%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.7%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-5.1-CodexLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured95.7Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured95.7%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-5.1-CodexLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured86.0%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-5.1-CodexLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1162Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1237Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1138Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1213Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1152Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-5.1-CodexLeader
IFBenchNot measured70.0%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured69.3%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-5.1-CodexLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A+$0.0010Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex$0.0063Fits in one request

Command A+ costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A+$0.019Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex$0.092Fits in one request

Command A+ costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A+$0.075Exceeds the context window
GPT-5.1-Codex$0.350Fits in one request

Command A+ costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A+ and GPT-5.1-Codex
SpecificationCohere Command A+OpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex
MakerCohereOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2026November 13, 2025
Context window192K400K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$1.25
Output $/Mtok$1.50$10.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked15.3
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.892
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A+ better than GPT-5.1-Codex for coding?

Only GPT-5.1-Codex has a coding score, 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A+ has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command A+ has the edge where output tokens cost 6.7x less.

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or GPT-5.1-Codex?

Command A+ costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.1-Codex only.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A+ or GPT-5.1-Codex?

GPT-5.1-Codex, with 400K tokens against 192K.

How many benchmarks is the Command A+ vs GPT-5.1-Codex comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A+'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.1-Codex's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next