Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Uncensored vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Uncensored and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 cost about the same per output token ($0.90 vs $0.85 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

C UncensoredCognitive Computations
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.90
S Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Sao10K
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.85
vs $0.90 vs $0.85 per 1M output tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 1.1x cheaper.

Uncensored or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Uncensored not benchmarked, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Uncensored $0.90 against Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 $0.85 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Uncensored takes 128K tokens, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Uncensored$0.0006Fits in one request
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2$0.0013Fits in one request

Uncensored costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Uncensored$0.013Fits in one request
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2$0.045Fits in one request

Uncensored costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Uncensored$0.049Exceeds the context window
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2$0.178Exceeds the context window

Uncensored costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Uncensored and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
SpecificationVenice UncensoredSao10K Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
MakerCognitive ComputationsSao10K
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 9, 2025August 28, 2024
Context window128K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.85
Output $/Mtok$0.90$0.85
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Uncensored better than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Uncensored or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

Uncensored costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 costs $0.85 and $0.85. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Uncensored or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2, with 131K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Uncensored and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next