Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Codestral 2508 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Codestral 2508 costs 3.9x less per output token than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ($0.90 vs $3.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 6 benchmarks have a result for both.

Codestral 2508Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.90
4
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
52.9
Output $/M
$3.50
2
vs boards won of 6 shared

Codestral 2508 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Codestral 2508 for output tokens 3.9x cheaper ($0.90 vs $3.50 per million) and a larger context window (256K against 128K tokens).

Shared results
6
Codestral 2508 only
2
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 only
40
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Codestral 2508 not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 4.9 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: UI components: Codestral 2508 1014 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 942, 9.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Codestral 2508 $0.90 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 per million output tokens, 3.9x apart.
Context window
Codestral 2508 takes 256K tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCodestral 2508BarsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Ties
Web design42
All shared boards42
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Coding IndexNot measured22.1Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
WeirdMLNot measured41.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
ALE-Bench137.8Not measuredOnly Codestral 2508 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1424Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1431Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured12.7Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.3Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured-$11Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured80.1%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured9.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1416Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1463Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1432Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark32.5%Not measuredOnly Codestral 2508 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1412Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1435Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured40.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1433Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1456Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1415Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1413Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index42
Web design benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites10121052Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Design Arena: UI components1014942Codestral 2508
Design Arena: game dev967956Codestral 2508
Design Arena: data viz1017950Codestral 2508
Design Arena: 3D1019997Codestral 2508
Design Arena: all code categories10071032Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
DTBenchNot measured80.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMCANot measured29.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured75.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured82.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1415Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1386Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1384Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1429Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1397Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1481Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1408Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1386Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1375Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1389Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1401Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1390Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1406Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1400Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1388Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1370Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Codestral 2508 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkCodestral 2508Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Codestral 2508$0.0008Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.0022Fits in one request

Codestral 2508 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Codestral 2508$0.018Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.033Fits in one request

Codestral 2508 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Codestral 2508$0.069Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.125Exceeds the context window

Codestral 2508 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Codestral 2508 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
SpecificationMistral Codestral 2508Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 1, 2025July 25, 2025
Context window256K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.45
Output $/Mtok$0.90$3.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Codestral 2508 better than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Codestral 2508 for output tokens 3.9x cheaper ($0.90 vs $3.50 per million) and a larger context window (256K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Codestral 2508 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Codestral 2508 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 and $3.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Codestral 2508 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Codestral 2508, with 256K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Codestral 2508 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 comparison based on?

6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Codestral 2508's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next