UI-TARS 7B vs Hy-MT2-7B

UI-TARS 7B costs 1.5x less per output token than Hy-MT2-7B ($0.20 vs $0.295 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace UI-TARS 7B Replace Hy-MT2-7B

UI-TARS 7BByteDance

Coding: No data
Overall: No data
Output $/M: $0.20

Hy-MT2-7BTencent

Coding: No data
Overall: No data
Output $/M: $0.295

vs $0.20 vs $0.295 per 1M output tokens. UI-TARS 7B is 1.5x cheaper.

UI-TARS 7B or Hy-MT2-7B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick UI-TARS 7B for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.20 vs $0.295 per million) and a larger context window (128K against 8K tokens).

Model AUI-TARS 7BByteDanceNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task Model BHy-MT2-7BTencentNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested both yet. UI-TARS 7B has results on Kagi LLM Benchmark; Hy-MT2-7B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
UI-TARS 7B
UI-TARS 7B takes 128K tokens against 8K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
UI-TARS 7B
UI-TARS 7B $0.0002, Hy-MT2-7B $0.0002 per turn.
List prices

At a glance

Coding index: UI-TARS 7B not benchmarked, Hy-MT2-7B not benchmarked.
Widest category: None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap: None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price: UI-TARS 7B $0.20 against Hy-MT2-7B $0.295 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window: UI-TARS 7B takes 128K tokens, Hy-MT2-7B 8K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured

Reasoning benchmarks for UI-TARS 7B and Hy-MT2-7B
Benchmark	UI-TARS 7B	Hy-MT2-7B	Leader
Kagi LLM Benchmark	20.7%	Not measured	Only UI-TARS 7B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

UI-TARS 7B$0.0002Fits in one request

Hy-MT2-7B$0.0002Fits in one request

UI-TARS 7B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

UI-TARS 7B$0.0056Fits in one request

Hy-MT2-7B$0.0046Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-7B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

UI-TARS 7B$0.022Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-7B$0.018Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-7B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of UI-TARS 7B and Hy-MT2-7B
Specification	ByteDance UI-TARS 7B	Tencent Hy-MT2-7B
Maker	ByteDance	Tencent
Weights	Open weights	Open weights
Released	July 22, 2025	August 19, 2026
Context window	128K	8K
Input $/Mtok	$0.10	$0.074
Output $/Mtok	$0.20	$0.295
Coding index	Not benchmarked	Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it	0	0
Cost per solved task	Not computable	Not computable
Source	OpenRouter listing	OpenRouter listing

Questions

Is UI-TARS 7B better than Hy-MT2-7B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick UI-TARS 7B for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.20 vs $0.295 per million) and a larger context window (128K against 8K tokens).

Which is cheaper, UI-TARS 7B or Hy-MT2-7B?

UI-TARS 7B costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Hy-MT2-7B costs $0.074 and $0.295. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, UI-TARS 7B or Hy-MT2-7B?

UI-TARS 7B, with 128K tokens against 8K.

Has any benchmark tested both UI-TARS 7B and Hy-MT2-7B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. UI-TARS 7B has results on Kagi LLM Benchmark; Hy-MT2-7B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.