Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

UI-TARS 7B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

UI-TARS 7B costs 4.0x less per output token than Qwen3 Coder Next ($0.20 vs $0.80 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

UI-TARS 7BByteDance
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
Qwen3 Coder NextQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.80
vs $0.20 vs $0.80 per 1M output tokens. UI-TARS 7B is 4.0x cheaper.

UI-TARS 7B or Qwen3 Coder Next: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick UI-TARS 7B for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $0.80 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. UI-TARS 7B has results on Kagi LLM Benchmark; Qwen3 Coder Next on AA Coding Index, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
UI-TARS 7B not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder Next not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
UI-TARS 7B $0.20 against Qwen3 Coder Next $0.80 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
UI-TARS 7B takes 128K tokens, Qwen3 Coder Next 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for UI-TARS 7B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkUI-TARS 7BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured36.2Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
SciCodeNot measured36.2%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured18.2%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
WeirdMLNot measured34.4%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for UI-TARS 7B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkUI-TARS 7BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured9.2Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for UI-TARS 7B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkUI-TARS 7BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.9Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured79.5%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for UI-TARS 7B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkUI-TARS 7BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured73.7%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured10.1%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark20.7%Not measuredOnly UI-TARS 7B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for UI-TARS 7B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkUI-TARS 7BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
IFBenchNot measured35.2%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured47.0%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

UI-TARS 7B$0.0002Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.0005Fits in one request

UI-TARS 7B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

UI-TARS 7B$0.0056Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.0084Fits in one request

UI-TARS 7B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

UI-TARS 7B$0.022Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.032Fits in one request

UI-TARS 7B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of UI-TARS 7B and Qwen3 Coder Next
SpecificationByteDance UI-TARS 7BQwen3 Coder Next
MakerByteDanceQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 22, 2025February 4, 2026
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.12
Output $/Mtok$0.20$0.80
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is UI-TARS 7B better than Qwen3 Coder Next for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick UI-TARS 7B for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $0.80 per million).

Which is cheaper, UI-TARS 7B or Qwen3 Coder Next?

UI-TARS 7B costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next costs $0.12 and $0.80. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, UI-TARS 7B or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next, with 262K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both UI-TARS 7B and Qwen3 Coder Next?

No benchmark has tested both yet. UI-TARS 7B has results on Kagi LLM Benchmark; Qwen3 Coder Next on AA Coding Index, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next