Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

UI-TARS 7B vs Lyria 3 Pro Preview

Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

UI-TARS 7BByteDance
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
Lyria 3 Pro PreviewGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
No data
vs 128K vs 1.05M context window. Lyria 3 Pro Preview fits 8.2x more.

UI-TARS 7B or Lyria 3 Pro Preview: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. UI-TARS 7B has results on Kagi LLM Benchmark; Lyria 3 Pro Preview has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
UI-TARS 7B not benchmarked, Lyria 3 Pro Preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
UI-TARS 7B $0.20 against Lyria 3 Pro Preview Free per million output tokens.
Context window
UI-TARS 7B takes 128K tokens, Lyria 3 Pro Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Reasoning benchmarks for UI-TARS 7B and Lyria 3 Pro Preview
BenchmarkUI-TARS 7BLyria 3 Pro PreviewLeader
Kagi LLM Benchmark20.7%Not measuredOnly UI-TARS 7B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

UI-TARS 7B$0.0002Fits in one request
Lyria 3 Pro Preview$0.0000Fits in one request

Lyria 3 Pro Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

UI-TARS 7B$0.0056Fits in one request
Lyria 3 Pro Preview$0.0000Fits in one request

Lyria 3 Pro Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

UI-TARS 7B$0.022Exceeds the context window
Lyria 3 Pro Preview$0.0000Fits in one request

Lyria 3 Pro Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of UI-TARS 7B and Lyria 3 Pro Preview
SpecificationByteDance UI-TARS 7BGoogle Lyria 3 Pro Preview
MakerByteDanceGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 22, 2025March 30, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.10Free
Output $/Mtok$0.20Free
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is UI-TARS 7B better than Lyria 3 Pro Preview for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, UI-TARS 7B or Lyria 3 Pro Preview?

UI-TARS 7B costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Lyria 3 Pro Preview costs Free and Free. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, UI-TARS 7B or Lyria 3 Pro Preview?

Lyria 3 Pro Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both UI-TARS 7B and Lyria 3 Pro Preview?

No benchmark has tested both yet. UI-TARS 7B has results on Kagi LLM Benchmark; Lyria 3 Pro Preview has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next