UI-TARS 7B vs Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
UI-TARS 7B costs 7.5x less per output token than Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) ($0.20 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.20
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $1.50
UI-TARS 7B or Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick UI-TARS 7B for output tokens 7.5x cheaper ($0.20 vs $1.50 per million) and a larger context window (128K against 66K tokens).
No benchmark has tested both yet. UI-TARS 7B has results on Kagi LLM Benchmark; Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos. Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Image generation
Design Arena: images
No call
Only Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) has a Design Arena: images result, 1239.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
UI-TARS 7B
UI-TARS 7B takes 128K tokens against 66K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
UI-TARS 7B
UI-TARS 7B $0.0002, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) $0.0010 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- UI-TARS 7B not benchmarked, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- UI-TARS 7B $0.20 against Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) $1.50 per million output tokens, 7.5x apart.
- Context window
- UI-TARS 7B takes 128K tokens, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) 66K.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | UI-TARS 7B | Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 20.7% | Not measured | Only UI-TARS 7B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
| Benchmark | UI-TARS 7B | Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: images | Not measured | 1239 | Only Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured |
| Design Arena: graphic design | Not measured | 1249 | Only Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured |
| Design Arena: logos | Not measured | 1214 | Only Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured |
| LMArena Text to Image | Not measured | 1250 | Only Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured |
| LMArena Image Edit | Not measured | 1313 | Only Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured |
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
UI-TARS 7B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
UI-TARS 7B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
UI-TARS 7B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | ByteDance UI-TARS 7B | Google Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | ByteDance | |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | July 22, 2025 | June 30, 2026 |
| Context window | 128K | 66K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.10 | $0.25 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.20 | $1.50 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is UI-TARS 7B better than Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick UI-TARS 7B for output tokens 7.5x cheaper ($0.20 vs $1.50 per million) and a larger context window (128K against 66K tokens).
Which is cheaper, UI-TARS 7B or Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)?
UI-TARS 7B costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) costs $0.25 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, UI-TARS 7B or Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)?
UI-TARS 7B, with 128K tokens against 66K.
Has any benchmark tested both UI-TARS 7B and Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)?
No benchmark has tested both yet. UI-TARS 7B has results on Kagi LLM Benchmark; Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.