Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Seed-2.0-Code vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs 3.9x less per output token than Seed-2.0-Code ($0.775 vs $3.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Seed-2.0-CodeByteDance Seed
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.00
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.775
vs $3.00 vs $0.775 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 is 3.9x cheaper.

Seed-2.0-Code or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed-2.0-Code has none yet; Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Seed-2.0-Code not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Seed-2.0-Code $3.00 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 $0.775 per million output tokens, 3.9x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.8%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
SciCodeNot measured41.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured15.2%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
WeirdMLNot measured38.7%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured12.0Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured53.2%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured52.1%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured79.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured15.9%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
ARC-AGINot measured11.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured1.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured91.0Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured91.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1058Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured963Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured951Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1070Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured994Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1038Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
General benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
IFBenchNot measured51.2%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured72.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
DTBenchNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMCANot measured23.5%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Seed-2.0-Code$0.0020Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0005Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Seed-2.0-Code$0.034Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0096Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Seed-2.0-Code$0.130Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.037Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Seed-2.0-Code and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SpecificationByteDance Seed Seed-2.0-CodeQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
MakerByteDance SeedQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026July 21, 2025
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.145
Output $/Mtok$3.00$0.775
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Seed-2.0-Code better than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Seed-2.0-Code or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Seed-2.0-Code costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.145 and $0.775. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Seed-2.0-Code or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

Has any benchmark tested both Seed-2.0-Code and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed-2.0-Code has none yet; Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next