Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Seed-2.0-Code vs Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor

Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor costs 15.0x less per output token than Seed-2.0-Code ($0.20 vs $3.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Seed-2.0-CodeByteDance Seed
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.00
Muse Spark 1.2 ContributorMeta
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
vs $3.00 vs $0.20 per 1M output tokens. Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor is 15.0x cheaper.

Seed-2.0-Code or Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Seed-2.0-Code not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Seed-2.0-Code $3.00 against Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor $0.20 per million output tokens, 15.0x apart.
Context window
Seed-2.0-Code takes 262K tokens, Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Seed-2.0-Code$0.0020Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor$0.0002Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Seed-2.0-Code$0.034Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor$0.0056Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Seed-2.0-Code$0.130Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor$0.022Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Seed-2.0-Code and Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
SpecificationByteDance Seed Seed-2.0-CodeMeta Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
MakerByteDance SeedMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026August 21, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.10
Output $/Mtok$3.00$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Seed-2.0-Code better than Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Seed-2.0-Code or Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor?

Seed-2.0-Code costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor costs $0.10 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Seed-2.0-Code or Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor?

Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Seed-2.0-Code and Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next