Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Seed-2.0-Code vs GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct costs 1.5x less per output token than Seed-2.0-Code ($2.00 vs $3.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Seed-2.0-CodeByteDance Seed
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.00
GPT-3.5 Turbo InstructOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
vs $3.00 vs $2.00 per 1M output tokens. GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct is 1.5x cheaper.

Seed-2.0-Code or GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Seed-2.0-Code for a larger context window (262K against 4K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed-2.0-Code has none yet; GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct on METR time horizons. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Seed-2.0-Code not benchmarked, GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Seed-2.0-Code $3.00 against GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct $2.00 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
Seed-2.0-Code takes 262K tokens, GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct 4K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Code and GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-CodeGPT-3.5 Turbo InstructLeader
METR time horizonsNot measured21.5%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Seed-2.0-Code$0.0020Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct$0.0025Fits in one request

Seed-2.0-Code costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Seed-2.0-Code$0.034Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct$0.081Exceeds the context window

Seed-2.0-Code costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Seed-2.0-Code$0.130Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct$0.320Exceeds the context window

Seed-2.0-Code costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Seed-2.0-Code and GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct
SpecificationByteDance Seed Seed-2.0-CodeOpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct
MakerByteDance SeedOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026September 28, 2023
Context window262K4K
Input $/Mtok$0.50$1.50
Output $/Mtok$3.00$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Seed-2.0-Code better than GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Seed-2.0-Code for a larger context window (262K against 4K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Seed-2.0-Code or GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct?

Seed-2.0-Code costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct costs $1.50 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Seed-2.0-Code or GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct?

Seed-2.0-Code, with 262K tokens against 4K.

Has any benchmark tested both Seed-2.0-Code and GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed-2.0-Code has none yet; GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct on METR time horizons. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next