Seed-2.0-Code vs UI-TARS 7B
UI-TARS 7B costs 15.0x less per output token than Seed-2.0-Code ($0.20 vs $3.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $3.00
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.20
Seed-2.0-Code or UI-TARS 7B: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Seed-2.0-Code for a larger context window (262K against 128K tokens).
No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed-2.0-Code has none yet; UI-TARS 7B on Kagi LLM Benchmark. Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Seed-2.0-Code
Seed-2.0-Code takes 262K tokens against 128K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
UI-TARS 7B
Seed-2.0-Code $0.0020, UI-TARS 7B $0.0002 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Seed-2.0-Code not benchmarked, UI-TARS 7B not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Seed-2.0-Code $3.00 against UI-TARS 7B $0.20 per million output tokens, 15.0x apart.
- Context window
- Seed-2.0-Code takes 262K tokens, UI-TARS 7B 128K.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Seed-2.0-Code | UI-TARS 7B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 20.7% | Only UI-TARS 7B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
UI-TARS 7B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
UI-TARS 7B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
UI-TARS 7B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | ByteDance Seed Seed-2.0-Code | ByteDance UI-TARS 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | ByteDance Seed | ByteDance |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | August 12, 2026 | July 22, 2025 |
| Context window | 262K | 128K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.50 | $0.10 |
| Output $/Mtok | $3.00 | $0.20 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Seed-2.0-Code better than UI-TARS 7B for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Seed-2.0-Code for a larger context window (262K against 128K tokens).
Which is cheaper, Seed-2.0-Code or UI-TARS 7B?
Seed-2.0-Code costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; UI-TARS 7B costs $0.10 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Seed-2.0-Code or UI-TARS 7B?
Seed-2.0-Code, with 262K tokens against 128K.
Has any benchmark tested both Seed-2.0-Code and UI-TARS 7B?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed-2.0-Code has none yet; UI-TARS 7B on Kagi LLM Benchmark. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.