Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Seed 1.6 vs Sonar Reasoning Pro

Seed 1.6 costs 4.0x less per output token than Sonar Reasoning Pro ($2.00 vs $8.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Seed 1.6ByteDance Seed
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
Sonar Reasoning ProPerplexity
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$8.00
vs $2.00 vs $8.00 per 1M output tokens. Seed 1.6 is 4.0x cheaper.

Seed 1.6 or Sonar Reasoning Pro: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Seed 1.6 for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($2.00 vs $8.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 128K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed 1.6 has none yet; Sonar Reasoning Pro on AA Intelligence Index. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Seed 1.6 not benchmarked, Sonar Reasoning Pro not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Seed 1.6 $2.00 against Sonar Reasoning Pro $8.00 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
Seed 1.6 takes 262K tokens, Sonar Reasoning Pro 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Seed 1.6 and Sonar Reasoning Pro
BenchmarkSeed 1.6Sonar Reasoning ProLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured11.8Only Sonar Reasoning Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Seed 1.6$0.0013Fits in one request
Sonar Reasoning Pro$0.0060Fits in one request

Seed 1.6 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Seed 1.6$0.018Fits in one request
Sonar Reasoning Pro$0.124Fits in one request

Seed 1.6 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Seed 1.6$0.070Fits in one request
Sonar Reasoning Pro$0.480Exceeds the context window

Seed 1.6 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Seed 1.6 and Sonar Reasoning Pro
SpecificationByteDance Seed Seed 1.6Perplexity Sonar Reasoning Pro
MakerByteDance SeedPerplexity
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 23, 2025March 7, 2025
Context window262K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$2.00
Output $/Mtok$2.00$8.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Seed 1.6 better than Sonar Reasoning Pro for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Seed 1.6 for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($2.00 vs $8.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Seed 1.6 or Sonar Reasoning Pro?

Seed 1.6 costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Sonar Reasoning Pro costs $2.00 and $8.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Seed 1.6 or Sonar Reasoning Pro?

Seed 1.6, with 262K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Seed 1.6 and Sonar Reasoning Pro?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed 1.6 has none yet; Sonar Reasoning Pro on AA Intelligence Index. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next