Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Seed 1.6 vs o1-pro

Seed 1.6 costs 300.0x less per output token than o1-pro ($2.00 vs $600.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Seed 1.6ByteDance Seed
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
o1-proOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$600.00
vs $2.00 vs $600.00 per 1M output tokens. Seed 1.6 is 300.0x cheaper.

Seed 1.6 or o1-pro: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Seed 1.6 for output tokens 300.0x cheaper ($2.00 vs $600.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 200K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed 1.6 has none yet; o1-pro on AA Intelligence Index and ARC-AGI. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Seed 1.6 not benchmarked, o1-pro not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Seed 1.6 $2.00 against o1-pro $600.00 per million output tokens, 300.0x apart.
Context window
Seed 1.6 takes 262K tokens, o1-pro 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Seed 1.6 and o1-pro
BenchmarkSeed 1.6o1-proLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured12.4Only o1-pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Seed 1.6 and o1-pro
BenchmarkSeed 1.6o1-proLeader
ARC-AGINot measured23.3%Only o1-pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Seed 1.6$0.0013Fits in one request
o1-pro$0.450Fits in one request

Seed 1.6 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Seed 1.6$0.018Fits in one request
o1-pro$9.30Fits in one request

Seed 1.6 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Seed 1.6$0.070Fits in one request
o1-pro$36.00Exceeds the context window

Seed 1.6 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Seed 1.6 and o1-pro
SpecificationByteDance Seed Seed 1.6OpenAI o1-pro
MakerByteDance SeedOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 23, 2025March 19, 2025
Context window262K200K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$150.00
Output $/Mtok$2.00$600.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Seed 1.6 better than o1-pro for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Seed 1.6 for output tokens 300.0x cheaper ($2.00 vs $600.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 200K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Seed 1.6 or o1-pro?

Seed 1.6 costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; o1-pro costs $150.00 and $600.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Seed 1.6 or o1-pro?

Seed 1.6, with 262K tokens against 200K.

Has any benchmark tested both Seed 1.6 and o1-pro?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed 1.6 has none yet; o1-pro on AA Intelligence Index and ARC-AGI. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next