Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Seed 1.6 Flash vs MiniMax-01

Seed 1.6 Flash costs 3.7x less per output token than MiniMax-01 ($0.30 vs $1.10 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Seed 1.6 FlashByteDance Seed
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
MiniMax-01MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
vs $0.30 vs $1.10 per 1M output tokens. Seed 1.6 Flash is 3.7x cheaper.

Seed 1.6 Flash or MiniMax-01: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Seed 1.6 Flash for output tokens 3.7x cheaper ($0.30 vs $1.10 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed 1.6 Flash has none yet; MiniMax-01 on Kagi LLM Benchmark. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Seed 1.6 Flash not benchmarked, MiniMax-01 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Seed 1.6 Flash $0.30 against MiniMax-01 $1.10 per million output tokens, 3.7x apart.
Context window
Seed 1.6 Flash takes 262K tokens, MiniMax-01 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Seed 1.6 Flash and MiniMax-01
BenchmarkSeed 1.6 FlashMiniMax-01Leader
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured42.5%Only MiniMax-01 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Seed 1.6 Flash$0.0002Fits in one request
MiniMax-01$0.0008Fits in one request

Seed 1.6 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Seed 1.6 Flash$0.0046Fits in one request
MiniMax-01$0.013Fits in one request

Seed 1.6 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Seed 1.6 Flash$0.018Fits in one request
MiniMax-01$0.051Fits in one request

Seed 1.6 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Seed 1.6 Flash and MiniMax-01
SpecificationByteDance Seed Seed 1.6 FlashMiniMax-01
MakerByteDance SeedMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 23, 2025January 15, 2025
Context window262K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.075$0.20
Output $/Mtok$0.30$1.10
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Seed 1.6 Flash better than MiniMax-01 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Seed 1.6 Flash for output tokens 3.7x cheaper ($0.30 vs $1.10 per million).

Which is cheaper, Seed 1.6 Flash or MiniMax-01?

Seed 1.6 Flash costs $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; MiniMax-01 costs $0.20 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Seed 1.6 Flash or MiniMax-01?

MiniMax-01, with 1M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Seed 1.6 Flash and MiniMax-01?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed 1.6 Flash has none yet; MiniMax-01 on Kagi LLM Benchmark. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next