Seed 1.6 Flash vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
Seed 1.6 Flash costs 33.3x less per output token than GPT-5.1-Codex-Max ($0.30 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.30
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $10.00
Seed 1.6 Flash or GPT-5.1-Codex-Max: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Seed 1.6 Flash for output tokens 33.3x cheaper ($0.30 vs $10.00 per million).
No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed 1.6 Flash has none yet; GPT-5.1-Codex-Max on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Terminal-Bench. Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max takes 400K tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Seed 1.6 Flash
Seed 1.6 Flash $0.0002, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max $0.0063 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Seed 1.6 Flash not benchmarked, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Seed 1.6 Flash $0.30 against GPT-5.1-Codex-Max $10.00 per million output tokens, 33.3x apart.
- Context window
- Seed 1.6 Flash takes 262K tokens, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max 400K.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
| Benchmark | Seed 1.6 Flash | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 83.6% | Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 22.2% | Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 60.4% | Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1228.3 | Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here | |||
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Seed 1.6 Flash | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| METR time horizons | Not measured | 70.8% | Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Seed 1.6 Flash | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | Not measured | 9.0% | Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Seed 1.6 Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Seed 1.6 Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Seed 1.6 Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | ByteDance Seed Seed 1.6 Flash | OpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | ByteDance Seed | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | December 23, 2025 | December 4, 2025 |
| Context window | 262K | 400K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.075 | $1.25 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.30 | $10.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Seed 1.6 Flash better than GPT-5.1-Codex-Max for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Seed 1.6 Flash for output tokens 33.3x cheaper ($0.30 vs $10.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, Seed 1.6 Flash or GPT-5.1-Codex-Max?
Seed 1.6 Flash costs $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex-Max costs $1.25 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Seed 1.6 Flash or GPT-5.1-Codex-Max?
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max, with 400K tokens against 262K.
Has any benchmark tested both Seed 1.6 Flash and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed 1.6 Flash has none yet; GPT-5.1-Codex-Max on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Terminal-Bench. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.