Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Seed 1.6 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Prime

Seed 1.6 Flash costs 29.3x less per output token than GLM 5.3 Prime ($0.30 vs $8.80 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Seed 1.6 FlashByteDance Seed
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
GLM 5.3 PrimeZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$8.80
vs $0.30 vs $8.80 per 1M output tokens. Seed 1.6 Flash is 29.3x cheaper.

Seed 1.6 Flash or GLM 5.3 Prime: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Seed 1.6 Flash for output tokens 29.3x cheaper ($0.30 vs $8.80 per million).

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Seed 1.6 Flash not benchmarked, GLM 5.3 Prime not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Seed 1.6 Flash $0.30 against GLM 5.3 Prime $8.80 per million output tokens, 29.3x apart.
Context window
Seed 1.6 Flash takes 262K tokens, GLM 5.3 Prime 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Seed 1.6 Flash$0.0002Fits in one request
GLM 5.3 Prime$0.0072Fits in one request

Seed 1.6 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Seed 1.6 Flash$0.0046Fits in one request
GLM 5.3 Prime$0.166Fits in one request

Seed 1.6 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Seed 1.6 Flash$0.018Fits in one request
GLM 5.3 Prime$0.648Fits in one request

Seed 1.6 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Seed 1.6 Flash and GLM 5.3 Prime
SpecificationByteDance Seed Seed 1.6 FlashZ.ai GLM 5.3 Prime
MakerByteDance SeedZ.ai
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 23, 2025September 23, 2026
Context window262K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.075$2.80
Output $/Mtok$0.30$8.80
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Seed 1.6 Flash better than GLM 5.3 Prime for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Seed 1.6 Flash for output tokens 29.3x cheaper ($0.30 vs $8.80 per million).

Which is cheaper, Seed 1.6 Flash or GLM 5.3 Prime?

Seed 1.6 Flash costs $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; GLM 5.3 Prime costs $2.80 and $8.80. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Seed 1.6 Flash or GLM 5.3 Prime?

GLM 5.3 Prime, with 1M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Seed 1.6 Flash and GLM 5.3 Prime?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next