Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Trinity Large Thinking vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Trinity Large Thinking leads Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 10.8 to 9.9, and Trinity Large Thinking costs 2.4x less per output token ($0.80 vs $1.90 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

Trinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.80
4
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
31
vs boards won of 35 shared

Trinity Large Thinking or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Trinity Large Thinking for output tokens 2.4x cheaper ($0.80 vs $1.90 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
35
Trinity Large Thinking only
17
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
14
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Trinity Large Thinking not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 36.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Trinity Large Thinking 90.1% against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 54.1%, 36.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Trinity Large Thinking $0.80 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryTrinity Large ThinkingBarsQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructTies
Coding12
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning14
Math02
Knowledge04
General019
All shared boards431
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12
Coding benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
LMArena WebDev1238Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
AA Coding Index25.8Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured64.6%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
SciCode40.6%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.7%11.4%Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text: coding13571438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT13621442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena WebDev: React1231Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1240Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index10.89.9Trinity Large Thinking
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index1.0Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
τ²-Bench Telecom90.1%54.1%Trinity Large Thinking
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Reasoning benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)75.2%77.2%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%11.9%Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text: hard prompts13421428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert13591442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13561439Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1255Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1277Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured88.3Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured88.3%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math13651425Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work13501419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
CaseLaw (Vals AI)57.9%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science13551444Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13491431Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government13451438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance13291433Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1137Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Design Arena: UI components1042Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Design Arena: game dev1078Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Design Arena: data viz1098Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Design Arena: 3D1081Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Design Arena: all code categories1117Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Design Arena: SVG1016Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1041Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index019
General benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
IFBench56.3%56.5%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)38.0%63.7%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Surface Evolver Bench15.6%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text13401420Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following13261406Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing13081366Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena VisionNot measured1247Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English13561429Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English13251405Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese13711463Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: German13561424Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese13121385Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Korean13061394Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: French13661452Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish13271428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian13381408Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Polish13121419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: multi-turn13201428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries13181419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language13171392Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12961368Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1256Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1283Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1253Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1209Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1281Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1249Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1220Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.0006Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.015Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.058Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Trinity Large Thinking and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationArcee AI Trinity Large ThinkingQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerArcee AIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 1, 2026September 23, 2025
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.21
Output $/Mtok$0.80$1.90
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Trinity Large Thinking better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Trinity Large Thinking for output tokens 2.4x cheaper ($0.80 vs $1.90 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Trinity Large Thinking or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Trinity Large Thinking costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Trinity Large Thinking or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Trinity Large Thinking vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Trinity Large Thinking's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next