Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Pro 1.0 vs Solar Mini 4

Updated October 21, 2026. 4 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Nova Pro 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
7.0
Output $/M
$3.20
0
Solar Mini 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
24.1
Output $/M
$0.20
4
vs boards won of 4 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Nova Pro 1.0 has the edge where what matters is AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
4
Nova Pro 1.0 only
38
Solar Mini 4 only
3
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Pro 1.0 not benchmarked, Solar Mini 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 62.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Nova Pro 1.0 21.0% against Solar Mini 4 83.3%, 62.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Pro 1.0 $3.20 against Solar Mini 4 $0.20 per million output tokens, 16.0x apart.
Context window
Nova Pro 1.0 takes 300K tokens, Solar Mini 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Pro 1.0BarsSolar Mini 4Ties
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
Web design01
General01
All shared boards04
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Solar Mini 4Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
SciCodeNot measured47.6%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: coding1270Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1271Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Solar Mini 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.024.1Solar Mini 4
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Solar Mini 4Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom14.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Solar Mini 4Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.9%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.2%25.8%Solar Mini 4
LMArena Text: hard prompts1246Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: expert1211Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1259Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Solar Mini 4Leader
AA Math Index7.0Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: math1252Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1261Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Solar Mini 4Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)69.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
MMLU82.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science1255Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1260Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1281Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1229Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Web design benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Solar Mini 4Leader
Design Arena: websites7961160Solar Mini 4
Design Arena: game devNot measured1113Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1153Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Solar Mini 4Leader
IFBench38.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)21.0%83.3%Solar Mini 4
LMArena Text1259Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1235Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1212Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Vision980Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: English1276Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1233Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1244Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: German1243Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1200Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1203Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: French1271Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1182Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1240Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1246Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1255Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1247Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1210Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Vision: English987Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Solar Mini 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.0024Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.050Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0031Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.192Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.012Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Pro 1.0 and Solar Mini 4
SpecificationAmazon Nova Pro 1.0Upstage Solar Mini 4
MakerAmazonUpstage
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024September 23, 2026
Context window300K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.80$0.05
Output $/Mtok$3.20$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Pro 1.0 better than Solar Mini 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nova Pro 1.0 has the edge where what matters is AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nova Pro 1.0 or Solar Mini 4?

Nova Pro 1.0 costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Pro 1.0 or Solar Mini 4?

Solar Mini 4, with 524K tokens against 300K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Pro 1.0 vs Solar Mini 4 comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Pro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Solar Mini 4's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next