Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Pro 1.0 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct leads Nova Pro 1.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.6 to 7.0, and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs 2.9x less per output token ($1.10 vs $3.20 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 38 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Nova Pro 1.0 Replace Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Nova Pro 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.20
0
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
38
vs boards won of 38 shared

Nova Pro 1.0 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova Pro 1.0 for a larger context window (300K against 262K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Model ANova Pro 1.0AmazonNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
38
Nova Pro 1.0 only
4
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct only
3
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Pro 1.0 not benchmarked, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 53.7 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run): Nova Pro 1.0 7.0% against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct 84.3%, 77.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Pro 1.0 $3.20 against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct $1.10 per million output tokens, 2.9x apart.
Context window
Nova Pro 1.0 takes 300K tokens, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Pro 1.0BarsQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math04
Knowledge05
General018
All shared boards038
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.3%78.4%Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.1%9.8%Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: coding12701440Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT12711447Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.09.6Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom14.0%41.5%Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.9%75.9%Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.2%12.6%Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts12461428Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert12111417Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12591431Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured66.7%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
AA Math Index7.084.3Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%84.3%Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: math12521440Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work12611434Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)69.1%82.4%Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
MMLU82.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science12551434Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12601455Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government12811431Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance12291422Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites796Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
IFBench38.1%60.7%Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)21.0%63.7%Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured55.6%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text12591417Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following12351388Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing12121333Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Vision980Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: English12761421Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English12331407Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese12441460Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: German12431416Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese12001395Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: Korean12031363Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: French12711414Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish11821435Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian12401404Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1398Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12461416Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries12551402Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language12471355Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12101349Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Vision: English987Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.0024Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.050Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$0.0083Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.192Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$0.031Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
SpecificationAmazon Nova Pro 1.0Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
MakerAmazonQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024September 11, 2025
Context window300K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.80$0.10
Output $/Mtok$3.20$1.10
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Pro 1.0 better than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova Pro 1.0 for a larger context window (300K against 262K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nova Pro 1.0 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?

Nova Pro 1.0 costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs $0.10 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Pro 1.0 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?

Nova Pro 1.0, with 300K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Pro 1.0 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Pro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next