Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Pro 1.0 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs 2.1x less per output token than Nova Pro 1.0 ($1.56 vs $3.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nova Pro 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.20
0
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.56
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

Nova Pro 1.0 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova Pro 1.0 for work measured by Design Arena: websites, where it leads.

Shared results
1
Nova Pro 1.0 only
41
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 only
7
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Pro 1.0 not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 48.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: websites: Nova Pro 1.0 796 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 1187, 48.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Pro 1.0 $3.20 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 $1.56 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
Context window
Nova Pro 1.0 takes 300K tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Pro 1.0BarsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Ties
Web design01
All shared boards01
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: coding1270Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1271Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.0Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom14.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.9%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.2%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1246Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: expert1211Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1259Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
AA Math Index7.0Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: math1252Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1261Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)69.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
MMLU82.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science1255Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1260Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1281Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1229Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Web design benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
Design Arena: websites7961187Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1175Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1105Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1135Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1118Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1166Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1107Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1094Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
IFBench38.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)21.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text1259Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1235Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1212Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Vision980Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: English1276Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1233Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1244Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: German1243Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1200Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1203Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: French1271Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1182Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1240Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1246Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1255Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1247Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1210Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Vision: English987Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.0024Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.0010Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.050Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.018Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.192Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.068Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Pro 1.0 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
SpecificationAmazon Nova Pro 1.0Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
MakerAmazonQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024February 16, 2026
Context window300K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.80$0.26
Output $/Mtok$3.20$1.56
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Pro 1.0 better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova Pro 1.0 for work measured by Design Arena: websites, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nova Pro 1.0 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

Nova Pro 1.0 costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs $0.26 and $1.56. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Pro 1.0 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15, with 1M tokens against 300K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Pro 1.0 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nova Pro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next