Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Pro 1.0 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads Nova Pro 1.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 8.9 to 7.0, and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 14.5x less per output token ($0.22 vs $3.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 38 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Nova Pro 1.0 Replace Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Nova Pro 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.20
0
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.22
38
vs boards won of 38 shared

Nova Pro 1.0 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova Pro 1.0 for a larger context window (300K against 262K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Model ANova Pro 1.0AmazonNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIANot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
38
Nova Pro 1.0 only
4
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only
4
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Pro 1.0 not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 51.7 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: Nova Pro 1.0 7.0 against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 91.0, 84.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Pro 1.0 $3.20 against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.22 per million output tokens, 14.5x apart.
Context window
Nova Pro 1.0 takes 300K tokens, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Pro 1.0BarsNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math04
Knowledge05
General018
All shared boards038
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured14.4Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.3%74.1%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
SciCodeNot measured30.6%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.1%13.6%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: coding12701378Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: software and IT12711383Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.08.9Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.0Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
τ²-Bench Telecom14.0%40.9%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.9%75.7%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.2%11.4%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: hard prompts12461348Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: expert12111355Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12591376Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Math Index7.091.0Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%91.0%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: math12521371Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: mathematical work12611375Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)69.1%79.4%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
MMLU82.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science12551353Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12601349Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: legal and government12811341Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: business and finance12291346Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Design Arena: websites796Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
IFBench38.1%71.1%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)21.0%38.0%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text12591348Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: instruction following12351303Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: creative writing12121269Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Vision980Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: English12761377Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: non-English12331320Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Chinese12441383Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: German12431348Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Japanese12001268Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Korean12031269Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: French12711396Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Spanish11821376Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Russian12401304Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1303Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12461319Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: longer queries12551300Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: writing and language12471283Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12101293Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Vision: English987Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.0024Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0002Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.050Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0034Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.192Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.013Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Pro 1.0 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
SpecificationAmazon Nova Pro 1.0NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
MakerAmazonNVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024December 14, 2025
Context window300K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.80$0.055
Output $/Mtok$3.20$0.22
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Pro 1.0 better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova Pro 1.0 for a larger context window (300K against 262K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nova Pro 1.0 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nova Pro 1.0 costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.055 and $0.22. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Pro 1.0 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nova Pro 1.0, with 300K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Pro 1.0 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nova Pro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next