Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Pro 1.0 vs Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Nova Pro 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
7.0
Output $/M
$3.20
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
vs $3.20 vs $1.50 per 1M output tokens. Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is 2.1x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Nova Pro 1.0 has the edge where the context window is larger, 300K against 66K tokens.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nova Pro 1.0 has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding; Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Pro 1.0 not benchmarked, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Nova Pro 1.0 $3.20 against Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) $1.50 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
Context window
Nova Pro 1.0 takes 300K tokens, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) 66K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: coding1270Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1271Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.0Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom14.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.9%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.2%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1246Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: expert1211Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1259Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Leader
AA Math Index7.0Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: math1252Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1261Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)69.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
MMLU82.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science1255Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1260Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1281Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1229Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Web design benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Leader
Design Arena: websites796Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards measured
General benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Leader
IFBench38.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)21.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text1259Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1235Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1212Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Vision980Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: English1276Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1233Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1244Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: German1243Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1200Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1203Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: French1271Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1182Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1240Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1246Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1255Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1247Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1210Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Vision: English987Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Leader
Design Arena: imagesNot measured1239Only Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured
Design Arena: graphic designNot measured1249Only Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured
Design Arena: logosNot measured1214Only Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured
LMArena Text to ImageNot measured1250Only Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured
LMArena Image EditNot measured1313Only Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) measured

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.0024Fits in one request
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)$0.0010Fits in one request

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.050Fits in one request
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)$0.017Fits in one request

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.192Fits in one request
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)$0.065Exceeds the context window

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Pro 1.0 and Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
SpecificationAmazon Nova Pro 1.0Google Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
MakerAmazonGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024June 30, 2026
Context window300K66K
Input $/Mtok$0.80$0.25
Output $/Mtok$3.20$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Pro 1.0 better than Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nova Pro 1.0 has the edge where the context window is larger, 300K against 66K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Nova Pro 1.0 or Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)?

Nova Pro 1.0 costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) costs $0.25 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Pro 1.0 or Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)?

Nova Pro 1.0, with 300K tokens against 66K.

Has any benchmark tested both Nova Pro 1.0 and Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nova Pro 1.0 has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding; Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next