Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Hy3

Updated October 21, 2026. 5 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Nova Premier 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
9.2
Output $/M
$12.50
0
Hy3Tencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.528
5
vs boards won of 5 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Nova Premier 1.0 has the edge where the context window is larger, 1M against 262K tokens, and where what matters is ALE-Bench or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
5
Nova Premier 1.0 only
8
Hy3 only
39
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Premier 1.0 not benchmarked, Hy3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 49.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: websites: Nova Premier 1.0 835 against Hy3 1230, 49.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Premier 1.0 $12.50 against Hy3 $0.528 per million output tokens, 23.7x apart.
Context window
Nova Premier 1.0 takes 1M tokens, Hy3 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Premier 1.0BarsHy3Ties
Coding01
Reasoning02
Web design01
General01
All shared boards05
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Hy3
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Hy3Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1507Only Hy3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)31.7%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
SciCodeNot measured48.6%Only Hy3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
ALE-Bench147.4838.6Hy3
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1466Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1463Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1511Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1487Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Hy3
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Hy3Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.2Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Hy3
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Hy3Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom38.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Hy3
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Hy3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)56.9%89.7%Hy3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%33.5%Hy3
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1447Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1461Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1455Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Hy3
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Hy3Leader
AA Math Index17.3Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)17.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1473Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1482Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Hy3
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Hy3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1457Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1452Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1422Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1424Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Web design benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Hy3
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Hy3Leader
Design Arena: websites8351230Hy3
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1207Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1208Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1163Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1233Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1227Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1200Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1157Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Hy3
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Hy3Leader
IFBench36.2%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)34.3%79.0%Hy3
LMArena TextNot measured1438Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1426Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1403Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1448Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1426Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1485Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1449Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1397Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1396Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1456Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1457Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1432Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1447Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1436Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1442Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1414Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1400Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Hy3
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Hy3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.0088Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0004Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.163Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0082Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.625Fits in one request
Hy3$0.032Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Premier 1.0 and Hy3
SpecificationAmazon Nova Premier 1.0Tencent Hy3
MakerAmazonTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 31, 2025July 6, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.132
Output $/Mtok$12.50$0.528
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Hy3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nova Premier 1.0 has the edge where the context window is larger, 1M against 262K tokens, and where what matters is ALE-Bench or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or Hy3?

Nova Premier 1.0 costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $12.50 per million output tokens; Hy3 costs $0.132 and $0.528. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Premier 1.0 or Hy3?

Nova Premier 1.0, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Premier 1.0 vs Hy3 comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Premier 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Hy3's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next