Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Nova Premier 1.0 leads Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.2 to 7.5, and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 41.7x less per output token ($0.30 vs $12.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nova Premier 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$12.50
3
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
41.5
Output $/M
$0.30
8
vs boards won of 11 shared

Nova Premier 1.0 or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova Premier 1.0 for a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
11
Nova Premier 1.0 only
3
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 only
34
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Premier 1.0 not benchmarked, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 49.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: Nova Premier 1.0 17.3 against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 66.3, 49.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Premier 1.0 $12.50 against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 $0.30 per million output tokens, 41.7x apart.
Context window
Nova Premier 1.0 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Premier 1.0BarsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Ties
Coding11
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning02
Math02
Knowledge01
General02
All shared boards38
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11
Coding benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)31.7%70.7%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
SciCodeNot measured33.0%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%6.1%Nova Premier 1.0
ALE-Bench147.4Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1416Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1417Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.27.5Nova Premier 1.0
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom38.3%28.1%Nova Premier 1.0
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured41.4%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)56.9%70.7%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%10.3%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured55.6%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1398Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1397Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1406Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark44.8%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Math Index17.366.3Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)17.3%66.3%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured62.2%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1394Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1411Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%80.5%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1393Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1392Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1387Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1389Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites835Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
IFBench36.2%50.7%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)34.3%61.3%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
DTBenchNot measured67.2%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMCANot measured22.4%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1384Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1363Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1317Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1391Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1372Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1432Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1379Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1337Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1330Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1419Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1404Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1369Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1353Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1378Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1378Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1336Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1334Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.0088Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.163Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0054Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.625Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.021Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
SpecificationAmazon Nova Premier 1.0Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
MakerAmazonQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 31, 2025July 29, 2025
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.09
Output $/Mtok$12.50$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova Premier 1.0 for a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?

Nova Premier 1.0 costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $12.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.09 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Premier 1.0 or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?

Nova Premier 1.0, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Premier 1.0 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nova Premier 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next